Charge transfer complex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Charge Transfer (CT) bands in transition metal complexes result from movement of electrons between molecular orbitals (MO) that are predominantly metal in character and those that are predominantly ligand in character. If the electron moves from the MO with ligand like character to the metal like one, the complexes is called Ligand to Metal Charge Transfer (LMCT) complex. If the electron moves from the MO with metal like character to the ligand like one, the complexes is called Metal to Ligand Charge Transfer (MLCT) complex. Thus a MLCT results in oxidation of the metal center whereas a LMCT results in the reduction of the metal center. Resonance Raman Spectroscopy[1] is a powerful technique to assign and characterize charge transfer bands.
[edit] Identification of CT bands[2]
Charge transfer complexes are identified by
1) Intensity: CT absorptions bands are highly intense and often lie in the Ultraviolet or Visible portion of the spectrum. The typical molar absorptivities, ε, of charge transfer complexes are about 50000 L mol-1 cm-1, that are three orders of magnitude higher than typical ε of 20 L mol-1 cm-1 or lower, for d-d transitions (transition from t2g to eg). This is because the CT transitions are not spin or Laporte forbidden as d-d transitions.
2) Solvatochromism: The transition frequency varies with variation in solvent permittivity, indicating a large shift in electron density as a result of the transition. This distinguishes it from the π* ← π transitions on the ligand.
[edit] Ligand to metal charge transfer complexes
LMCT complexes arise from transfer of electrons from MO with ligand like character to those with metal like character. This type of transfer is predominant if complexes have ligands with relatively high energy lone pairs (example S or Se) or if the metal has low lying empty orbitals. Many such complexes have metals in high oxidation states (even d0). These conditions imply that the acceptor level is available and low in energy.
Consider a d6 octahedral complex (example IrBr63-). The t2g levels are filled as shown in Figure 1. Consequently an intense absorption is observed around 250 nm corresponding to a transition from ligand σ MO to the empty eg MO. However, in IrBr62- that is a d5 complex two absorptions, one near 600 nm and another near 270 nm, are observed. This is because two transitions are possible, one to t2g (that can now accommodate one more electron) and another to eg. The 600 nm band corresponds to transition to the the t2g MO and the 270 nm band to the eg MO.
Figure 1. MO diagram showing Ligand to Metal Charge Transfer for a d6 octahedral complex
Another thing to note is that CT bands might also arise from transfer of electrons from nonbonding orbitals of the ligand to the eg MO.
[edit] Trend of LMCT energies
Oxidation Number
+7 MnO4- < TcO4- < ReO4-
+6 CrO42- < MoO42- < WO42-
+5 VO43- < NbO43- < TaO43-
The energies of transitions correlate with the order of the electrochemical series. The metal ions that are most easily reduced correspond to the lowest energy transitions. The above trend is consistent with transfer of electrons from the ligand to the metal, thus resulting in a reduction of metal ions by the ligand.
[edit] Examples of LMCT Complexes
1) MnO4- : The permanganate ion having tetrahedral geometry is intensely purple due to strong absorption involving charge transfer from MO derived primarily from filled oxygen p orbitals to empty MO derived from manganese(VII).
2) CdS: The color of artist’s pigment cadmium yellow is due to transition from Cd2+ (5s) ← S2-(π).
3) HgS: it is red due to Hg2+ (6s) ← S2-(π) transition.
4) Fe Oxides: they are red and yellow due to transition from Fe (3d) ← O2-(π).
[edit] Metal to Ligand Charge Transfer Complex (MLCT)[3]
MLCT complexes arise from transfer of electrons from MO with metal like character to those with ligand like character. This is most commonly observed in complexes with ligands having low-lying π* orbitals especially aromatic ligands. The transition will occur at low energy if the metal ion has a low oxidation number for its d orbitals will relatively be high in energy.
Examples of such ligands taking part in MLCT include 2,2’-bipyridine (bipy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), CO, CN- and SCN-. Figure 2 illustrates the MO diagram for a MLCT complex with a d5 metal center.
Figure 2. MO diagram showing Metal to Ligand Charge Transfer for a d5 octahedral complex
[edit] Examples of MLCT Complexes
1) Tris(2,2’-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) : This orange colored complex is being studied [4] as the excited state resulting from this charge transfer has a lifetime of microseconds and the complex is a versatile photochemical redox reagent.
2) W(CO)4(phen).
3) Fe(CO)3(bipy).
[edit] Photoreactivity of MLCT excited states
The photoreactivity of MLCT complexes result from the nature of the oxidized metal and the reduced ligand. Though the states of traditional MLCT complexes like Ru(bipy)32+ and Re(bipy)(CO)3Cl were intrinsically not reactive, several MLCT complexes have been synthesized that are characterized by reactive MLCT states.
Vogler and Kunkely4 considered the MLCT complex to be an isomer of the ground state which contains an oxidized metal and reduced ligand. Thus various reactions like electrophillic attack and radical reactions on the reduced ligand, oxidative addition at the metal center due to the reduced ligand, and outer sphere charge transfer reactions can be attributed to states arising from MLCT transitions. MLCT states’ reactivity often depends on the oxidation of the metal. Subsequent processes include associative ligand substitution, exciplex formation and cleavage of metal---metal bonds.
[edit] Charge transfer complexes and color
Many metal complexes are colored due to d-d electronic transitions. Visible light of the correct wavelength is absorbed, promoting a lower d-electron to a higher excited state. This absorption of light causes color. These colors are usually quite faint, though. This is because of two selection rules:
- The spin rule: Δ S = 0
On promotion, the electron should not experience a change in spin. Electronic transitions which experience a change in spin are said to be spin forbidden.
- Laporte's rule: Δ l = ± 1
d-d transitions for complexes which have a center of symmetry are forbidden - symmetry forbidden or Laporte forbidden.[5]
Charge transfer complexes do not experience d-d transitions. Thus, these rules do not apply and the absorptions are generally very intense.
For example, the classic example of a charge-transfer complex is that between iodine and starch to form an intense purple color. This has wide-spread use as a rough screen for counterfeit currency. Unlike most paper, the paper used in US currency is not sized with starch. Thus, formation of this purple color on application of an iodine solution indicates a counterfeit.
[edit] History
In 1954 researchers at Bell Labs and elsewhere reported charge-transfer complexes with resistivities as low as 8 ohms/cm.[6][7] In 1962, the well-known acceptor, tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) was reported. Similarly, the classic donor, tetrathiafulvalene (TTF), was synthesized in 1970. A CT complex composed of the TTF and TCNQ was discovered in 1973.[8] This was the first organic conductor to show almost metallic conductance. In a crystal of TTF-TCNQ, the TTF and TCNQ are stacked independently and an electron transfer from donor (TTF) to acceptor (TCNQ) occurs. Hence, electrons and holes can transfer in the TCNQ and TTF columns, respectively.
In 1980, the first organic molecule that was also a superconductor was discovered. Tetramethyl-tetraselenafulvalene-phosphorus hexafloride TMTSF2PF6 shows superconductivity at low temperature (critical temperature) and high pressure: 0.9 K and 12 kbar. Since 1980, many organic superconductors have been synthesized, and the critical temperature has been raised to over 100 K as of 2001. Unfortunately, critical current densities in these complexes are very small.
CT complexes have many useful applications and more properties are expected to be discovered.
[edit] Other Examples
Hexaphenylbenzenes like H (fig. 3) lend themselves extremely well to forming charge transfer complexes. Cyclic voltammetry for H displays 4 well separed maxima corresponding to H+ right up to H4+ with the first ionization at E1/2 of only 0.51 eV. oxidation of these arenes by for instance dodecamethylcarboranyl (B) to the blue crystal solid H+B- complex is therefore easy.[9]
The phenyl groups are all positioned in an angle of around 45° with respect to the central aromatic ring and the positive charge in the radical cation is therefore through space delocalised through the 6 benzene rings in the shape of a toroid. The complex has 5 absorption bands in the near infrared region which can be assigned to specific electronic transitions with the aid of deconvolution and the Mulliken-Hush theory.
[edit] Charge transfer complexes and disease
In humans, elevated systemic levels of transition-series metals, electron-donors, etc. are associated with specific disease symptoms. These include psychosis, movement disorders, pigmentary abnormalities, and deafness. This may involve charge-transfer complexes with the Melanin in the midbrain, skin, and the stria vascularis of the inner ear.
[edit] See also
[edit] References
1. Shriver, D.; Atkins, P. Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York 1999
2. Miessler, G. L.; Tarr, D. A. Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: New Jersey 1999.
3. Kalyanasundaram, K. Photochemistry of Polypyridine and Porphyrin Complexes, Academic: New York 1992.
4. Vogler, A.; Kunkely, H. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 321.
5. Robert J. Lancashire, Selection rules for Electronic Spectroscopy, accessed 1 October 2006
6. ^ Y. Okamoto and W. Brenner Organic Semiconductors, Rheinhold (1964)
7. ^ H. Akamatsu,H.Inokuchi, and Y.Matsunaga, Nature 173 (1954) 168
8. ^ P. W. Anderson, P. A. Lee, M. Saitoh, Solid State Communications, 13 (1973) 595-598
9. ^ Through-Space (Cofacial) -Delocalization among Multiple Aromatic Centers: Toroidal Conjugation in Hexaphenylbenzene-like Radical Cations Duoli Sun, Sergiy V. Rosokha, Jay K. Kochi Angewandte Chemie International Edition Volume 44, Issue 32 , Pages 5133 - 5136 2005 Abstract