ebooksgratis.com

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
Talk:Capital punishment in the Philippines - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk:Capital punishment in the Philippines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
⚖
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
??? This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

Should explain what reclusion perpetua is.

Not in a new article, making the now red link (also similarly in the article) Reclusion perpetua blue ? 217.84.50.179 20:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be in another article, yes. Or possibly Wiktionary... --Masamage 01:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Or that! Bravo. --Masamage 03:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Isn't it the case that the Spanish form of the phrase is reclusió perpètua, but it is actually based on the Latin phrase: reclusio perpetua. The form reclusion perpetua appears half English, half Latin, i.e. neither fish nor fowl. (See http://www.spellingcenter.com/reclusion+perpetua ) Or is this a Philippine idom? --Ziusudra 11:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Erm... Spanish does *not* have a grave accent, ever, and Latin words ending in "-io" turn into "-ión" in Spanish. Furthermore, "perpetu@" does *not* have an accent on the second "e"; the Spanish phrase is "reclusión perpetua". —Nightstallion (?) 22:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

What on earth is up with the methods section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.57.120 (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -