Talk:Campbell Newman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Portal	Campbell Newman is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Brisbane.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Claim made of:

Despite this issue being key to his election, it is important to note that the Newman lead Council-commissioned consultation the proposal showed a high level of support for the Soorley plan ^{[citation needed]}

...no source cited and open to argument. Should be written as opinion not as a fact without a source.

Further claim of:

Despite claims to be "on time and below budget," the Bridge was completed some 12 months after it was original planned to be completed and after taking into account ancillary works, was over budget. The delay and budget blowout was entirely attributable to Newman's waffling support for the bridge.^{[citation needed]}

This is not cited, is potentially libellous and not up to Wikipedia standards

Absolutely, the article read like a bad op ed and was completely unsourced. I've junked most of it. FiggyBee (talk) 20:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)