Image talk:Camille Clifford.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The original image is English, not U.S. The original image may have lost its copyright protections, but this newly created digital image has not - it is a derivative work and part of a private, copyrighted collection. I've asked the copyright holder if we can use it, but as it stands, this image most certainly isn't PD - as it comes from a copyrighted website. Rklawton 21:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Contesting. Direct quote from Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#Public_domain: "Also note that in the United States, reproductions of two-dimensional artwork which is in the public domain because of age do not generate a new copyright — for example, a straight-on photograph of the Mona Lisa would not be considered copyrighted (see Bridgeman v. Corel)." Note the Mona Lisa isn't U.S. either. Seems a clear reproduction of two-dimensional artwork, no important original work in the derivation. AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
