Talk:Billy Godleman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Billy Godleman is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Categories and templates: criterion met

[edit] Ratings

WP Cricket rating as at 28th April, 2007. This is very early in his career, so the class rating could quickly decline if the article is not regularly updated. The article would benefit from an infobox. JH (talk page) 19:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Infobox now added. Although of course I agree with you that the article should be regularly updated, it's important to stress that this does not mean every single innings Godleman plays has to be mentioned, even if he passes 50! Now that his initial run of half-centuries is at an end, future such scores are less likely to be notable in and of themselves. Loganberry (Talk) 01:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Even 40 was a good contribution, in the context of the match. I wonder how long he will have to wait for a Test call-up, if he keeps up this rate of scoring. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)