User talk:Benjamintchip
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Duplicate Image:Manzanitasol.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Manzanitasol.jpg, by Staeckerbot, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Manzanitasol.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Manzanitasol.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Manzanitasol.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Manzanita_Sol_Manzanitasol.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Manzanita_Sol_Manzanitasol.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Pepsi-Ice-Cucumber.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pepsi-Ice-Cucumber.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gossip Girl: The Carlyles (novel)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gossip Girl: The Carlyles (novel), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbninquiry.asp?ean=9780316020640. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Friday the 13th
I've reverted your edits because we need a reliable source to acknowledge the release date. Simply linking to a summary page that is equivalent to IMDb (which is not reliable) is not an acceptable source. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'm specifically referring to that Bloody-Disgusting source. It isn't an actual news report, heck, most of the time they report rumors from "scoopers". Please find a reliable source reporting on the release date of the film. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Fridaythe13thfilms.com is a fansite, and automatically deemed "unreliable". Unless they conduct a personal interview with someone, whatever they are posting as news is considered unreliable. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:38, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- First, it IS a fansite. Neither New Line or Paramount own any piece of that website. It is owned and operated by dedicated fans. Hence why they lost their site for a brief period because they couldn't afford to pay the fee to keep it running. Secondy, Platinum Dunes does not have a page on Bloody-Disgusting, Brad Fuller is simply operating a blog on that page. Ironically, Brad Fuller has not, in any of his blogs, mentioned a release date for the film. Now, the blogs are fine to use, because they are straight from the horses mouth, but Fuller hasn't mentioned a date. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
-
