Talk:Begin to Hope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
I think that we should include a section detailing the reasons why everyone needs to own Begin to Hope. 72.73.233.249 15:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sounds like that could be done with a few links to reviews about how good for the soul it is. Like in a box underneath the info box. RandomEcho 14:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I love her so much she is my favorite artist of all time!
This is an encyclopedia not a fan site... Dlarrivee 03:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Where are these sale numbers coming from? It is hard to believe.... because a week ago, according to Nielsen SoundScans, "Begin to Hope" in US sold about 200,000 copies... 67.86.197.149 18:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC) .
Where can it be mentioned that the song "Lady" is about Billie Holiday? Wikifried 07:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] "Single success" section
Shouldn't the contents of this section be moved to, and integrated within, the main "Fidelity (song)" article? Charolastra charolo 22:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Is this right?
"In Australia, the album was certified Gold for sales of more than 35,000."
I don't believe this is true. I thought that Gold certification was awarded for shipment of a certain number of copies, not sales? -Anthony- 11:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Begintohope.jpg
Image:Begintohope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Questionable citaton: 407,000 copies sold??
Is a message board really suitable citation for such a claim? I would think a page with sales count from a web site belonging to the likes of Billboard or her record label would be better. I could just be nit-picking, but come on! A message board? --ComposerWannabe (talk) 09:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
