Talk:Barack (brandy)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move "Barack (brandy)" to "Barack", per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 14:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Propose move over redirect. This is the only "barack" article, and it already contains a hatnote for Barack Obama. --HailFire (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Uhh, no per WP:DAB: "Ask yourself: When a reader enters a given term in the Wikipedia search box and pushes "Go", what article would they most likely be expecting to view as a result?" — AjaxSmack 22:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

  Comment extending that notion, I would wager that a strong majority of the people typing in Barrack into the search box are looking for the same thing; and similar cases made for Hillary, Hilary, Bush, etc. How far should the what they most likely be expecting go? My opinion is that Wikipedia needs to establish a strict No one-name automatic redirect policy for all but the most obvious cases; but, given the rhetoric at Talk:Obama (disambiguation), election years (or the year before an election year) are apparently not the time to bring it up. I see no sense in waging the same battle here... now. Neier (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Strong oppose. Five years ago maybe yes. In 100 years maybe yes. Right now no way. Compulsions70 (talk) 00:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong oppose. Agree with the points above. Also, Wikipedia becomes a propaganda tool if Barack redirects to Brandy. (PS I'm English, so not voting either way!) Sam Staton (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.