Talk:Australian Soil Classification
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Australian Soil Classification is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This subject is within the scope of Soil WikiProject, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve these articles or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
[edit] Just Australia?
I think I have read that the ASC is becoming the universally used soil classification system. if this is so the heavy mentioning of Australia (the "part of the Australia project" tag for example) should be revised. --Hypo Mix 07:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- So long as it has "Australian" in its name, I think it should be tagged into the Australia project. But if you can find references suggesting that it has been or is being universally adopted, then please put them in and tone down the Oz talk. Hesperian 11:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
