User talk:Astroguy2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently you carried out a copy and paste page move from Interstellar planetary mass object . Please do not move articles by copying and pasting them because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself using the move link at the top of the page, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Natalie 20:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Astroguy2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! WilyD 14:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Billion pool
This message is regarding your creation of Wikipedia:Billion pool. Now is not the time for a pool of a number of articles more than 10 million. I nominated it for deletion. Georgia guy 23:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- It has no purpose. The time to create a 20M pool is when Wikipedia reaches 2.5M articles. The time to create a billion pool is when Wikipedia reaches 100 million articles. Look at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Billion pool and it will discuss a debate with the consensus to delete. Are you a sockpuppet of the creator of the billion pool of then?? Please do not lie. Georgia guy 23:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Space restroom
A tag has been placed on Space restroom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 08:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Space restroom/toilet
I thought somebody would have had to post an article about that by now. Realkyhick 08:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dumb Question...
So, why is there now a redirect from 533 (number) to 500 (number)? It seems illogical to me. And perhaps wrong. Can you gimme a good reason? Mercy--talk at me 12:46, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- The word fox appears on the page Kurama (YuYu Hakusho). That doesn't mean I'd redirect it. Mercy--talk at me 12:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- You seem to have created a lot of number redirect pages of questionable value. Number pages can be a hot topic with a considerable number of people keen to delete all non notable ones. You might like to gain community consensue on the issue at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numbers before doing any more. If you looking for things to do have a look at Wikipedia:Community Portal. --Salix alba (talk) 21:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Eleventy billion bottles of beer...
Somehow I was away for this: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Eleventy-billion pool and the most charming and edited of the far-far-future pools was deleted (slightly less out-of-process than last time). Just a heads-up. +sj + 09:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Colonization of the North Pole
An editor has nominated Colonization of the North Pole, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonization of the North Pole and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
