Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ygorl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Comment I'll throw a few references out quickly from the computer game. Putting in talk as I don't think it's too relevant.
Contents |
[edit] Closing administrator's rationale
If you choose to add comments to this page, please do so in a new section below, do not inturrupt my comments here.
[edit] Raw count analysis
- Delete
- Straight delete
- Undead warrior (8 edits) <nominator>
- Eusebeus
- Gavin.collins (8 edits)
- EEMIV (3 edits)
-
- or merge
- Percy Snoodle (5 edits)
- Keep
- Straight keep
- Quasirandom
- Robbstrd
- BOZ (8 edits)
- Poisonink/ 75.134.169.84
- Shemeska (3 edits)
-
- Or merge to Slaad
- Casliber 2 edits
- Webwarlock (3 edits)
- Hobit (4 edits)
- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles (7 edits)
- Merge
- To Slaad
- ArglebargleIV
- Craw-daddy (3 edits)
- Freederick
- Ig8887
- Jfire
- Non-participatory
- SineBot - doing that whole sinebot thing
- Smcmillan (2 edits) - reverted self
- Pb30 - delsort
[edit] Valid keep arguments
- a valid third-party source has been provided
- Wikipedia:Five pillars: notability to a real-world audience, plenty of refereces, consistent with a "specialized encyclopedia" concerning fictional topics with importance in the real world.
[edit] Discounted keep arguments
- history behind the character
- character appears in some game
- keep, out of spite
- appeared in more than just one fictional medium and was voiced by a notable actor
- around for a long time and developed by a notable author
- notability is not inherited
[edit] Valid Delete Arguments
- Fails to meet WP:NOTABILITY
- No valid third-party sources
- orginal research
- No assertion of real-world notability per WP:FICT
- in-universe perspective absent information on development and critical response
[edit] Discounted Delete Arguments
- just describing another game character, just a character
- demonstrates bias against this type of subject
- stock character
- A stock character is one which relies heavily on cultural types or stereotypes for their personality, manner of speech, and other characteristics.
- WP:NOT#PLOT
- article is not essentially a plot summary
- WP:WEASEL
- maintenance issue, not deletion criteria
- WP:WAF
- this is a writing-style guide, no deletion criteria here
- possibly dubious claims
- copyright violation (some of the language sounds like it's straight from a scholarly source)
- If it sounds good it must be a copyvio? What about try to find the scholarly source and cite it?
- to be a valid third party source, it must discuss real-world history or impact
- no such requirement exists
[edit] Summary
The Merge !votes outnumbered the keep and delete !votes combined. Merge outcome seems likely to address all valid concerns. Ergo: Merge JERRY talk contribs 08:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge and Redirect
Jerry, thank you for your rational and well thought out comments. I have completed the merge and redirect to Slaad. That article is also up for AfD but I feel it fails to meet the criteria for many of the same reasons you have listed here. Web Warlock (talk) 21:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)