Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Johnson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unknown Johnson

Seems to be a character on a soap opera that may or may not exist. In limited Googling, I haven't really found this term in use anywhere. The sources mentioned in the article don't seem to mention the term "Unknown Johnson" at all. Delete per those reasons. Wickethewok 23:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• The character is the son of two prominent characters on the show. The identity of this missing child has been a major mystery that has gone on for almost the show's entire 7+ year history. He is related to several characters on the show.

  Presumably if the mystery ever is solved the need for the article would go away or it would have to be merged with whoever the person really is.

  Also if someone has a better name than Unknown_Johnson I'm willing to change the name of the article. I picked that name because the child was born out of wedlock to a character named Eve Johnson. Unnamed_Crane or Unnamed_Child_Of_Julian_and_Eve might also work.ksofen666

  • Please review our Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. Everything here must be verifiable and not original research. If you wish to argue that this article should be kept, you must cite sources where people have already discussed the possible identity of this soap opera character in detail. And note that that means Reliable sources, not just someone idly speculating on Usenet or on a web log. Uncle G 01:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Eve Johnson, but not necessarily with a redirect there. The articles about Passions characters I have seen seem to mostly list the characters' relatives, with minimal prose content. If Eve has a son, previously thought dead, but who turns out to be alive with an unknown identity, put that in the article about her, which contains hardly any information other than the list of relatives. --Metropolitan90 04:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I am changing my recommendation to delete in order to avoid a "no consensus keep" result, but I would accept a merge as above. --Metropolitan90 06:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. We don't even know if Julian and Eve's son is alive or not. When he is proven to be definitively alive (or, at least as definitively as possible for a soap), the necessity for such an article can be reevaluated. Charity 22:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.