Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Popper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete NawlinWiki 02:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rafael Popper

Notability not established, autobiography, resurrection of the material speedy deleted per A7 Alex Bakharev 01:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and Salt - no demonstration of notability, created by the subject, patent WP:COI. --Haemo 03:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless multiple, independent sources are included that demonstrate beyond a doubt that this subject passes Wikipedia:Notability (academics), especially since this seems to be autobiographical. Note that Rafael popper (talk · contribs) is a new user and was probably not aware of the policies he was breaking. I've posted to his talk page a detailed discussion of the problems with such articles and how they may be dealt with. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 03:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above and WP:SPAM seems applicable too. Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 12:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:SPAM. dcandeto 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP:SPAM and loads of external links placed everywhere, no external links sections and its notability is lacking.Tellyaddict 16:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lacks the sources to pass WP:BIO, and obvious WP:SPAM concerns.-- danntm ^T _C 19:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep: Meets WP:V and WP:N, what more do you Nazi's want? -Dual Freq 19:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.