Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partscaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Partscaster
Original research, orphaned page since 2006. Looks like very narrow, local term or term invented by page creator. GreyCat (talk) 13:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete-No, its not a term created by the author; however, there are no hits referring to this particular make of guitar. Rather than just leaving it there, the article should either be improved upon or deleted. The former is rather impossible however, as there are very little, if any, sources of information about this guitar. Thus, deletion is the way to go. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable --Starionwolf (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. e.g. not a single google book search or amazon book search hit; i see it in use sparingly on the web, not sure if even qualifies as a neologism yet though. - Owlmonkey (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.