Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PGNx Media (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted, CSD G4. Article is insufficiently different from the previously deleted version. GarrettTalk 02:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PGNx Media
Checking around, this article was already deleted once. I'd like feedback from the community about whether or not the page is any better now. I should point out that the main author, User:Thinkjose, is the site owner. For reference, the first AfD debate can be found at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PGNx_Media. --Alan Au 15:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Alan Au 15:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC) --Alan Au 15:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Hmm, up to 142 unique Ghits outside of domain, that's an improvement.... Blatant POV issues, reads WAY too much like an advertisement. Site's biggest claim to fame is being a contributor to other websites. --Roninbk t c # 16:02, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- delete clearly self-promotion. Fails WP:WEB. — brighterorange (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- delete Main claim for notability, "source of syndicated reviews" is original research. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.149.171.62 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete - Blantant self-promotion and POV issues. The Kinslayer 22:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.