Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Tesselschade Visscher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - notable and verifiable according to consensus. Non admin closure. Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 01:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maria Tesselschade Visscher

Maria Tesselschade Visscher (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable poet, with only digital versions of his poems as references, with very few other sources on the web. Jmlk17 22:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep - Notable character of the Dutch Golden Age and the Muiderkring. I added a ref to the small bio at the Rijksmuseum, but there are plenty of Dutch references (eg here is an excellent one) and I can find a Britannica one when the site's up tomorrow. By the way, she's a she. Gordonofcartoon 02:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There's plenty of information on the web about her and she's clearly notable. Just because a Dutch poet who lived from 1594-1649 hasn't appeared on Letterman is no reason for deletion. I wonder how closely the nominator actually read the article as it clearly states that the poet was a woman. Nick mallory 06:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• Easy keep Also notable as an engraver, not that that is yet covered. I agree with Nick m above. Johnbod 01:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as notable and sourced, just a stub that needs more content. Bearian 19:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.