Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoko Chan Cox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge and redirect GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 03:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC) non-admin closure
[edit] Kyoko Chan Cox
The subject does not seem to meet the Wikipedia Guidelines for Notability. Her main claim to fame seems to be that she is the daughter of Yoko Ono. Being related to a famous person does not make one famous. NatureBoyMD 02:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to Yoko Ono. Masaruemoto 02:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Fg2 11:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Her main claim to fame seems to be that she is the daughter of Yoko Ono. If she has any other claim, I can't detect it. Don't merge; just zap and redirect. -- Hoary 11:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect per others above. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Question: To me, the demand to "merge" implies that there's some mergeworthy content. Do I understand this right; and if so, what's the mergeworthy content here? All I see is dribs and drabs about the private life of somebody who's neither notable nor a celeb. -- Hoary 06:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I don't care about the topic at all, but if someone who does care thinks there's something worth merging, that's fine with me. And I'm not "demanding" anything. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- "Demand" wasn't well chosen. However, a better alternative isn't obvious: "Suggestion" seems too weak; I'd have said "vote", but then we're often reminded that AfDs aren't votes. -- Hoary 07:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I don't care about the topic at all, but if someone who does care thinks there's something worth merging, that's fine with me. And I'm not "demanding" anything. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and Redirect to Yoko Ono - I'm going with WP:BLP1E on this one. Kyoko Chan Cox is mentioned by name in a Wikipedia article about the larger subject Yoko Ono. There are WP:RS material on Cox (see below), but these mostly are in relation to events of Yoko Ono's life. Cox otherwise remains of essentially low profile. The reliable sources only cover the Kyoko Chan Cox in the context of the 1972 Yoko child custody event, Yoko's 1986 public letter to Cox, and Cox's potential to inherit 200M from Yoko. These three events can be covered in the Yoko Ono article. Here is what I found:
- New York Times Abstracts. (February 21, 1972) Domestic Relations Ct, Houston, will rule Mar 3 on temporary custody of 9-yr-old girl K Cox. Page 53
- AP (January 26, 1986) Magazine Reports Word Of Yoko Ono's 'Long-Lost' Daughter. Section: Domestic News
- Churcher, Sharon. (January 7, 2001) Mail on Sunday The little girl who will inherit half of John Lennon's 400M fortune; First meeting between Yoko Ono and granddaughter her family refused to let her see.
- Bessonette, Colin. (June 14, 2002) Atlanta Journal and Constitution. Q & A (answering 'What ever happened to Yoko Ono's daughter?') Section: Metro News; page D2.
- Barton, David. (April 23, 2003) Chicago Sun Times. Lennon auction tapes trace Kyoko custody trip. Page 68.
- Merge and Redirect to Yoko Ono as above. Harlowraman 19:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect for falling short of WP:BIO. --Aarktica 21:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete view. I really don't like the concept of merging/redirecting non-notable relatives into the articles of other notable people. What is the policy here? Basically, this person aint notable so the article should go. Bridgeplayer 23:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.