Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin R. Ryan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Docg 10:14, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kevin R. Ryan
Subject un-notable, only authoritative reference is a single local newspaper article Deusnoctum 23:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This article has no context and might even be speedied, although I'm not sure. Very strange and certainly not deserving of its own article. --Charlene 02:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Sadly Loose Change is a popular film these days and Kevin Ryan is one of the 'actors' within it. I came to the page after watching the "documentary" and I think it serves that purpose. Tidy it up and make it more scholarly, but don't delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.82.205.138 (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
Related release re Kevin Ryan recently in: "Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report"
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/4/prweb518612.htm
"[G]roup of scientists, researchers and 9/11 family members challenging the official [9/11] reports...
"...These are very basic inconsistencies and suggest some serious data integrity problems."
"The group submitting the Request includes 9/11 family members Bob McIlvaine and Bill Doyle, physicist Steven E. Jones, former UL manager, Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage, AIA, and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice."
- Comment - Anybody can post a press release on PRWeb (though, after reading it, not everybody can spell "Berkeley" properly). Everything in this article is about his criticism of official 9/11 reports; at very best, this should have its own section in an article for "Loose Change" or 9/11 conspiracy theories and their related groups. Deusnoctum 18:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.