Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godzilla
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP.
[edit] Godzilla
Fancruft. Non-notable (IMO). Delete. Ketsuban (is 1337) 01:25, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. Can we speedy keep this please? - Mustafaa 01:28, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:30, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep & Object to this nomination :-P -CunningLinguist 01:30, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, nonsensical nomination. --Sn0wflake 01:39, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Yes, there are plenty of bad nominations, some of which are kept when the error is realized. How does this help? -- BD2412 talk 01:48, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep. Same user as Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Wiktionary. We can hope that users will realize that this sort of disruption only costs them support... --Tabor 01:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable movie/s and movie character. Capitalistroadster 02:08, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Godzilla and Mothra, enough said. Also, Moooozilla. :-P --Chill Pill Bill 02:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Physchim62 02:42, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Do you really think it's appropriate to waste everyone's time to prove a point? Go gripe on irc or the pump. Gamaliel 03:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This is the least justified nomination I've seen so far. --Arcadian 18:08, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
