Talk:Arjun Singh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
	This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Contents 1 Protect this please 2 Income tax Defaulter 3 Down with Arjun Singh! 4 POV remark 5 Let both sides of the tale be known! 6 Removed resignation of Knowledge commission members 7 Arjun Singh: curse to India

[edit] Protect this please

Arjun Singh is involved in a recent controversy, so it would be better for wikipedia to protect this page for some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.72.40 (talk) 01:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Just now I saw the line "He has sex with dogs". Please protect to prevent such vandalism.

Please sign your comments. Anyways, we only protect articles that are being vandalized constantly. If we did, it would also protect against valuable contributions from anonymous readers and newly registered accounts. Psychless 18:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Income tax Defaulter

Provide link for this

[edit] Down with Arjun Singh!

{deleted}

PS: It was only my respect for Wikipedia that kept me from posting these comments in the main article.

[edit] POV remark

There is specifically one remark that is obviously POV, but I also believe that the whole second paragraph may be POV. Specifically, {deleted} is obviously POV. The whole paragraph above that may also be POV, was there "a lot of controversy"? I don't know about Indian politics, so I can't really judge this issue. Aggelophoros 22:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Of course it drew a lot of controversy. Its the news every other day and proof of the extreme reaction is this page's history itself. See how many times I have reverted inflammatory comments from this article. You managed to catch this before I can correct. I have removed the last edit however I am leaving the POV section template till I can rewrite it to POV free state. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Done it. Removing POV bits from the intro also. Leaving a mention of the Churhat lottery scandal, I think, but mentioning that it was just an allegation. Hornplease 07:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Let both sides of the tale be known!

The way Ambuj Saxena is removing any and every article edit that shows the HRD minister in a poor light makes me wonder if the editor himself is adherent to the concept of NPOV.

I agree that derogatory and abusive language is not the way to go in Wikipedia. But genuine criticism should not be edited just for the need of portraying the minister as an angel. Let us accept the fact that Arjun Singh is no Messiah for the backward classes; he stated it very poignantly in media that he played the current political master-stroke to further the interests of Congress party.

So dear Ambuj, unless you have a vested interest in portraying him as an angel, allow for facts other than the sugary introduction highlighting his one time felicitation as an outstanding parliamentarian.

{deleted} —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.101.16.235 (talk • contribs).

Dear editor,

I have no vested interests in portraying Arjun Singh in either good light or bad light. Unfortunately all the edits reverted by me were totally attacking and hence unencyclopedic making them unfit to be added here. If you add facts (and not views), there is nobody who will revert your edits. If someone does, I promise that I will revert them back. We are free to hold our views on any topic. But we should let Wikipedia reflect NPOV as Wikipedia is not a soapbox for political views. If you want to contact me personally regarding any protest, et al., you can contact me by E-mail. BTW, if you want to know my views on the issue, you can check my orkut profile, the link of which can be found on my userpage. Hope that you contribute to Wikipedia constructively from now onwards. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Well done Anbuj

[edit] Removed resignation of Knowledge commission members

Horplease, The resignation of the Knowledge Commission members is irrelevant to this article.

[edit] Arjun Singh: curse to India

{deleted}

What about Arjun's Singh's misconduct during Bopal gas problem where he was CM? Please write that here