Anti-hunting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anti-hunting is a term which is (often informally) used to identify or describe persons or groups, generally in a political context, who stand in opposition to hunting. It is also used to describe efforts to prevent hunting through legislation and other means which can include acts of civil disobedience such as hunt sabotage. Anti-hunting laws such as the English Hunting Act 2004 are generally distinguishable from conservation legislation such as the American Marine Mammal Protection Act by whether they seek to reduce or prevent hunting for perceived cruelty related reasons or to regulate hunting for conservation, although the boundaries of distinction are sometimes blurred in specific laws, for example when endangered animals are hunted.

While anti-hunting does not appear to be pejorative so much as descriptive, the term is widely used by pro-hunting, and traditional hunting conservation sources.

1 Geographic differences
- 1.1 Opinion polls
- 1.2 Class issues
2 See also
3 Notes
4 External links

[edit] Geographic differences

It is difficult to compare strength of anti-hunting sentiment in different countries, for example because the word 'hunting' carries different meanings in the UK and United States. Nonetheless, it is more possible to compare the strength of the anti-hunting movement in different countries, with some having stronger organization, such as in the UK, and some being nearly without it, such as New Zealand. However, as can be seen in the results table, opinions can vary widely on different surveys even within the same country, and as in all market research, consideration must be given to the wording of the questions, which can influence results.^[1]

[edit] Opinion polls

Country	Polling Firm	Question	Date of polling	Source	Pro hunting	Anti hunting	Don't know/ no opinion
United Kingdom	MORI for BBC(n=2,234)	To what extent do you support or oppose a ban on hunting with dogs?	Feb 2005	[1]	26%	47%	27%
United Kingdom	MORI for RSPCA/IFAW (n=1,983)	Do you support the ban [on hunting with dogs] staying in place / being scrapped?	2-8 February 2007	[2]	17	58	24
United States	Responsive Management	Do you approve or disapprove of legal hunting?	September 2006	[3]	78	16	6
Northern Ireland	Millward Brown	Is fox hunting cruel?	20-27 March 2006	[4]	11	79	10
United States	Responsive Management	Do you approve or disapprove of legal hunting?	1995	[5]	73	22	5

[edit] Class issues

The neutrality of this section is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.(December 2007)
Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved.

Class has sometimes been proposed as a possible differentiating factor between hunting in the UK and hunting in the United States. This seems, however, to form a very minor aspect of the UK's anti-hunting movement.

The Burns Inquiry analysed opposition to hunting in the UK. They reported that:

"There are those who have a moral objection to hunting and who are fundamentally opposed to the idea of people gaining pleasure from what they regard as the causing of unnecessary suffering. There are also those who perceive hunting as representing a divisive social class system. Others, as we note below, resent the hunt trespassing on their land, especially when they have been told they are not welcome. They worry about the welfare of the pets and animals and the difficulty of moving around the roads where they live on hunt days. Finally there are those who are concerned about damage to the countryside and other animals, particularly badgers and otters."^[2]

Despite this element of class, traditional support for hunting, notably rabbit and hare coursing, has long been a part of working class culture in the United Kingdom.^[3]. As recently as 2005, one anti-hare coursing organisation referred to coursing supporters as being made up of "10% Nobs and 90% Yobs".^[4]

Such an element of class is absent from the hunting debate in the United States where there are not many obvious class differences in hunting habits (except for there being little evidence for significant support of hunting by the welfare class). Instead the differences in anti-hunting sentiment relates to urban sprawl and increasing population density. ^[5] Because of the abundance of public land in the United States, as high as 75% of the land in some states, one need not be wealthy to have access to huntable land in less densely populated areas.

The democratic perspective on hunting in the United States started as a result of the reaction against English laws restricting game to the crown.^[6]. This is one of the aspects of American culture which formed as a result of that nation's original high number of refugees from the UK and Ireland.(see Enclosure movement)

A further difference between the context of debate on hunting in the UK and US is that US hunting is often licensed by Government, providing licence fee income to the state. In contrast to this, hunting in the UK has broadly required only the permission of the landowner or the owner of sporting rights over the land.