User talk:Aliibn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Aliibn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dlohcierekim 01:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your edits:

[edit] Your edits

I reverted poor quality edits which appear to have been where you have been disrupting wikipedia to make a point. Please read WP:POINT •CHILLDOUBT• 13:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

No, you are reverting ALL edits done by me to prove a point, that anyone who doubts the Great White Fathers of Wikipedia's wisdom will be censored.

Or so it seems. Every edit I have done is done with reason, that of increasing accuracy. Aliibn (talk) 13:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Rubbish. Please check your contribution history. Far from reverting all your edits. I have left the majority of your edits, which are constructive, and reverted only those which are disruptive. Again, please stop playing the victim card, as doesn't help your case at all•CHILLDOUBT• 13:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Please attempt to behave in a civil manner. Aliibn (talk) 13:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Alawism

Sigh. Ill give you the benefit of the doubt before reverting back your edit again. Why exactly are you removing an image from this article? •CHILLDOUBT• 13:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

It is a 19th century picture; no evidence that it is an accurate one of Ali ... nor is it even one from an Alawite source; it's Iranian (Alawites are mostly Syrians) and not from that tradition. Aliibn (talk) 13:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

If you check the history of the discussions [[1]] this has already been discussed and it appears that as a result of the discussions. the picture has stayed. I suggest you use the talk page to raise any concerns you might have, rather than just deleting it. I am reinstating this for now as from your reasoning above, this seems to be a blatant WP:POINT abuse resulting from the Talk Muhammed discussions •CHILLDOUBT• 14:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

That discussion is about pictures of Ali in general; in the Alawism case, it is somewhat different as all the other pictures are directly related to Alawis. Aliibn (talk) 14:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

The discussion includes that painting specifically. I suggest you read all the way to the end •CHILLDOUBT• 14:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but not in that context. Aliibn (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Alawism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Farix (Talk) 21:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Looks like I've been banned ...

oddly, moments after identifying my ethnicity ... on the pretext that I am User:Alberuni. Odd that. Aliibn (talk) 00:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

(Even odder that, if you look that up, 138 separate accounts have been banned by User:Jayjg due to his belief that they are all one person, User:Alberuni, something quite improbable (sorry wikipedia isn't _that_ important). (Interesting to see this email of his: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-December/087744.html ; hardly an unbiased guy! Aliibn (talk) 00:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)