Talk:Agence métropolitaine de transport
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
Contents |
[edit] Housekeeping
While it is true that the TRAM system goes up to zone 8, there are no train stations above zone 6, hence, no TRAIN tickets for zone 7 and 8.
> Actually, the Saint-Jérôme station (opening at the end of 2006) will be in zone 7. --Einstein2000 15:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
While it is true that the new BiLevel coaches are wheelchair accessible, there are no wheelchair accessible stations - yet.
[edit] MAP issues
NICE MAP!
- BUT (however!)....could it be magnified to a readable size??
- What are these TWO lines heading towards Mascouche??
- What is this spur to Boisbriand??
If some of these lines are mere speculation, what are they doing being posted?? Bacl-presby 00:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
still, no takers on changing that map?? Bacl-presby 13:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Some answers
- I tried to make it more readable, but as I wish to keep it to scale and not too big, I thought it was a good compromise. (when you download it, you can see it more clearly).
- The two lines going to Mascouche are two propositions under study at the AMT. Like no real decision has been made on this project, I thought it was better to show all the possibilities (anyway, the legend clearly says dotted lines are projects).
- Spur to Boisbriand is a proposition made many times by the city of Boisbriand and the Faubourg Boisbriand team (the project currently under construction on the old GM plant site). As it's not actually an official AMT project, I agree I could remove it.
- By Einstein2000 20:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Future projects
To ease over-crowding on the Deux-Montagnes line, there are plans to:
- Create an overpass for the commuter train to by-pass CN's Saint-Laurent subdivision near Montpellier station (a freight line with moderate usage). CN says that it will not allow any more commuter trains without a new overpass.
- Such an overpass can probably not be built without interrupting the existing service. A much neater solution would be to pass the CN mainline over the commuter line. This overpass could be built immediately to the south and parallel to the existing CN track. There is enough room to do so. This could be built with minimal interruption of current services. Passing under the commuter line is not an option because of physical restraints. Peter Horn 19:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fares
"The commuter train fare system is based on the assumption that the user is travelling to or from downtown. There are no reductions, for example, for travel between zone 2 and 5 or exclusively in zone 3."
This kind of fare structure does nothing to encourage greater use of public transit. The AMT is possibly the only transit authority on the face of this earth to commit this kind of a blunder. Correct me if you can. For comparison in practice see The West Coast Express and West Coast Express regular fares and GO Transit fares
Peter Horn 23:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Peter Horn 23:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Long Article
Anyone else think this article is getting long? I'd advise on removing the full list of all commuter train stations. GO Transit doesn't have the full list on its article. Alex@MTRL 02:08, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fares - Response
Peter, your comment needs no correction. It's the sad truth.
I've always thought the greater Montreal area needs a system like Boston.
- ONE transit authority which takes care of subways, urban buses, regional buses and trains
- Instead of the 15+ transit companies we currently have (AMT, STM, STL, RTL, 11 CIT's)
- Zone system based on distance to downtown BUT with intermediate fares for travel between two zones
- We would also need an upgradable fare system. For example, if I have a TRAM 3 pass and want to go into Zone 5, I now need to pay a full fare from downtown. An upgradable fare would allow me to pay only for the stations not included in the TRAM 3 pass.
But, all this would require thinking.
Alex
Alex@MTRL 16:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tramzone6.png
Image:Tramzone6.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deux-Montagnes Line (Future projects)
Agence métropolitaine de transport#Deux-Montagnes Line It would be by far easier to take the CN secondary main line over the Deux-Montagnes Line. On the west, the grade could start where the CN passes under Quebec Autoroute 40 and to the aest it could go for the sams distance from the Deux-Montagnes Line The surface tracks can be and need to be left in place. The new overpass could be constructed without disrupting existing traffic. Taking the Deux-Montagnes Line over the CN line would be a MAJOR engineering head ache. The right of way is simply not wide enough. Peter Horn 01:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
