Talk:Adelaide Rams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Adelaide Rams has been listed as a good article under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do, and if it no longer meets these criteria, it can be delisted or reassessed.
Review: June 9, 2008. |
 |
Adelaide Rams has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
The article on Adelaide Rams is supported by the WikiProject on Rugby League, which is to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league related articles on Wikipedia. If you wish this article to be re-assessed, go to our Assessment Department and add it to the list. If you wish this article to be peer-reviewed, go to our Peer Review Department and add it to the list. If you rated this article you may want to leave some comments here on how the article can be improved. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Adelaide Rams is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Rugby league. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Adelaide 1998.jpg
Image:Adelaide 1998.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Info Box
I undid a number of edits that were causing problems with the info box. Apologies to any one whose edits I may have deleted. The box works now. Ozdaren (talk) 12:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA review notes
-
- ...but lost two of their three matches in Europe, leaving them outside qualification for their group with no possibility of playing in the finals series... - erm, shouldn't it simply be that they 'failed to qualify for...'? the bolded bit gives an impression there is something else in between going to happen.
-
-
Done Hopefully fixed.
-
-
- demised - erm, not seen this used as a verb. Saw the discussion on 'wound up'. Umm.....(long pause)...'liquidated'? 'dismantled'? There may be other verbs, have a think on it.
-
-
- Done Done by Jeff79.
-
- OK, gave it a bit of a copyedit. Two tweaks above needed. Otherwise it is neutral, prose is good, comprehensive and qualifies for GA status. I will think on some things which may get it somewhere further to FAC if possible overnight. Cheers, Casliber (talk ยท contribs) 14:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for the review. I'll contact you on your talk page, and hope this passes. I'm not really worrying about FA just yet, but any help would be appreciated. The Windler talk 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA passed
Easy peasy - this one was alot more polished than hte Cumberland one. It is tricky to see if it can be substantial enough for FAC but possible..was there a book written which may have some more info? One of the super league wars books or something.
Other ideas to chase. These are a few that come to mind.
- A short para on Existing amateur league competition in Adelaide (I suspect there was/is one) and its relationship with media/league elsewhere etc.
- Reception in Adelaide, mascots, any insight on local following or lack thereof..
- Any more notable games/players
- The most intriguing is the machinations between the ARL and SL, especially at the end when plans were afoot to see which clubs ended up on the chopping block - who Adelaide were touted as merging with, why talks broke down and whether it was the ARL that really pushed for them to fold (?).
