Talk:A-4AR Fightinghawk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated projects or task forces:

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:

Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked

To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call:

|B-Class-1=yes/no

|B-Class-2=yes/no

|B-Class-3=yes/no

|B-Class-4=yes/no

|B-Class-5=yes/no

Aircraft WikiProject

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	South American military history task force

	This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina If you would like to participate, you can improve A-4AR Fightinghawk, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] cleanup tag

I dont know exactly why is here. I think I wrote the article clearly enough. Could someone clarify please ?. If you mean grammar It should be replaced by copyedit --Jor70 23:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I didn't know about the copyedit tag. Fixed. Good article, BTW! - Aerobird 01:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! What do you think about changing the start rating to something up ? --Jor70 01:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Well it needs a little smoothing - I may work on that, in between the other 821 articles on my watchlist of course - but once that's done B Class is a distinct possibility. - Aerobird 02:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! I appreciated it. Pls tell me if specific information is needed. I have lot of photos too but I think we may have a license issue. --Jor70 14:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)