User talk:70.108.119.24
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Catherine Deneuve
Since you have seemingly neglected to use the Catherine Deneuve article discussion page, I will discuss the article with you here on your talk page. Please discuss any contentions you have before making any further edits to the Catherine Deneuve article.
First of all, as I've said, your edits include many formatting mistakes. Please read the Wikipedia manual of style article to understand proper formatting on Wikipedia.
Secondly, it is completely unnecessary to rearrange the sections like you have. The sections on the Catherine Deneuve article are arranged much like many actor/actress pages, or any other biographical article for that matter (especially those regarding entertainers and athletes), on the English Wikipedia site. "Personal life" sections are almost always placed after a career overview section and after sections pertaining to accomplishments, or outside work, or both (as is the case in the Catherine Deneuve article).
Anyway, I hope you understand why your edits were reverted. As I said, if you have any contentions, please use your talk page here before making any further edits to the Catherine Deneuve article. Thank you. -- Luke4545 (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Catherine Deneuve. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. PeterSymonds (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Right, just seen your message. I'm disappointed that you both made reversions after I warned you; don't do it again, please. If you do, you will both be blocked for 24-48 hours for engaging in an edit war after warning. Okay, my suggestion now is that you go to the talk page and have a proper discussion. I'm not even clear what it's about, so I'd like clear explanations on both sides to be put onto the talk page. I will monitor the discussion as well. If after 2 days you have not agreed a resolution, I will open a Request for Comment on your actions, which just means that other editors comment on each side. Please do not let me down by editing the page until the dispute is over. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 00:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |
