See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.

CLASSICISTRANIERI HOME PAGE - YOUTUBE CHANNEL
Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms and Conditions
User talk:67.188.208.203 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:67.188.208.203

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] 3RR

Please read WP:3RR. If you revert more than 3 times in 24 hours you may be reported and blocked.Ultramarine (talk) 01:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I read that rule and do follow it. That last revert is do undo a false positive for a bot, and does not count. You have also reverted at least three times. If you revert again within 24 hours, I will report you.67.188.208.203 (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
No such rule. 3RR is for all reverts.Ultramarine (talk) 01:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Bots are not editors. The rule is to undo the work of another EDITOR. You need to go back and read the rules.67.188.208.203 (talk) 01:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Bots are not one of the listed exceptions.Ultramarine (talk) 01:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Bots are not editors, so they do not apply. If you don't believe me go to talk page of the 3RR page and ask them this question. Reverting a false positive from a bot does not count. Also, dont leave me more messages here. Go away.67.188.208.203 (talk) 01:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
If you revert again I will report you.Ultramarine (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Same with you.67.188.208.203 (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

The recent edit you made to State terrorism and the United States constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Will (talk) 01:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC))


You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I looked over this user's edits, and I see no violations. What is the basis for this block? It seems unjust to me, as a regular editor who has followed the issues on that article. No where is his edits vandalism.Giovanni33 (talk) 02:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)




aa - ab - af - ak - als - am - an - ang - ar - arc - as - ast - av - ay - az - ba - bar - bat_smg - bcl - be - be_x_old - bg - bh - bi - bm - bn - bo - bpy - br - bs - bug - bxr - ca - cbk_zam - cdo - ce - ceb - ch - cho - chr - chy - co - cr - crh - cs - csb - cu - cv - cy - da - de - diq - dsb - dv - dz - ee - el - eml - en - eo - es - et - eu - ext - fa - ff - fi - fiu_vro - fj - fo - fr - frp - fur - fy - ga - gan - gd - gl - glk - gn - got - gu - gv - ha - hak - haw - he - hi - hif - ho - hr - hsb - ht - hu - hy - hz - ia - id - ie - ig - ii - ik - ilo - io - is - it - iu - ja - jbo - jv - ka - kaa - kab - kg - ki - kj - kk - kl - km - kn - ko - kr - ks - ksh - ku - kv - kw - ky - la - lad - lb - lbe - lg - li - lij - lmo - ln - lo - lt - lv - map_bms - mdf - mg - mh - mi - mk - ml - mn - mo - mr - mt - mus - my - myv - mzn - na - nah - nap - nds - nds_nl - ne - new - ng - nl - nn - no - nov - nrm - nv - ny - oc - om - or - os - pa - pag - pam - pap - pdc - pi - pih - pl - pms - ps - pt - qu - quality - rm - rmy - rn - ro - roa_rup - roa_tara - ru - rw - sa - sah - sc - scn - sco - sd - se - sg - sh - si - simple - sk - sl - sm - sn - so - sr - srn - ss - st - stq - su - sv - sw - szl - ta - te - tet - tg - th - ti - tk - tl - tlh - tn - to - tpi - tr - ts - tt - tum - tw - ty - udm - ug - uk - ur - uz - ve - vec - vi - vls - vo - wa - war - wo - wuu - xal - xh - yi - yo - za - zea - zh - zh_classical - zh_min_nan - zh_yue - zu -