User talk:129.78.64.102

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of DavidYork71. Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful. Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

Attention:

This IP address, 129.78.64.102, is registered to University of Sydney and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

---

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.

School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

[edit] March 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Haemo 04:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:BrendelSignature. Thank you. Gwernol 22:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tofu, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 11:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Agenda for Change, you will be blocked from editing. --Mary quite contrary | hai? 06:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mbc³⁶² 02:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Your recent edit to Soundsnaughty (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Australia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to St Andrew's College, Sydney, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 13:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Women's College, you will be blocked from editing. MER-C 13:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- KOS | talk 13:04, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Flying Spaghetti Monster, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. John Vandenberg 06:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Researching with Wikipedia (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 03:39, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to St Andrew's College, Sydney (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --Ed (Edgar181) 14:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

--Ed (Edgar181) 14:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kangaroo Point, you will be blocked from editing. Dibo ^{T | C} 04:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Let me tell you that I find it extremely irritating, and I am guessing many others would too, that you had seemingly at some point inserted [citation needed] under every section in seemingly a large number of articles. I had thought that it must have been some idiotic imbecile bent on disrupting Wikipedia to make a point and who thinks that's really funny or something. Surely you need not be so extreme in asserting your viewpoint to cite references. For the sake of the readers' sanity, stop doing it. -- 129.78.64.102 20:49, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

(appended here for completeness 129.78.64.102 19:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC))

• Thanks for the abuse and sorry you find this so annoying, it must be almost as annoying as me having to deal with articles to which people have failed to add citations. It says "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable" at the bottom of every edit page ie content should not be added if it is not with a citation. You will also notice that all my inputs do have citations. I got with the programme, others should too. I don't think I'm the "idiotic imbecile" here. Ardfern 20:56, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

• • I don't think you see my point at all. I am saying that you are being extremely irritating and disruptive because you are putting the "citation needed" tags above every single paragraph in an article, not because you want citations for all the information appearing in an article. There is a tag {{Unreferenced}} that people put only at the top of an article with no citations. Why don't you use that instead, or create some tag that says "most of the article is unreferenced"? Or do you not see how seeing the tags everywhere is irritating by the normal Wikipedia reader, even if not so by its experienced editors at all?

• • It is only an honest plain truth that I thought it could only have been idiotic imbecile who would have done something like that, not from an active Wikipedian such as you with tons of edits. But it's your choice if you want to self-identify with "idiotic imbecile" and feel abused; I make no apologies if that's how you wish to misinterpret my words. -- 129.78.64.102 19:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

The unreferenced tag you refer to, is only suitable where there are no references at all in an article, and I use that where appropriate. In many articles there are unreferenced paragraphs, which I seek to highlight (and which you find objectionable) and some with references (often refs I have added) and thus the unreferenced tag is not suitable. Surely not too difficult a concept to grasp. All Wiki articles are supposed to be fully referenced and intelligent Wiki readers would prefer to understand that the article they are reading has elements which are not referenced or sourced, but elements which are fully referenced and verifiable. Otherwise how can they trust the Wiki information they see. If all info added to articles was referenced, I wouldn't need to take any action. If only it were so. Ardfern 20:06, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to articles, as you did to this article last night. --Bduke 22:59, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

more vandalism has happened from this IP to Christian Catholic Apostolic Church Crystal and Thorium GB 04:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kyle Sandilands. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Recurring dreams 11:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 00:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Caringbah High School, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 00:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Information logistics, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acroterion _(talk) 01:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Ingrid Moses, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mark Chovain 14:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] September 2007

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 01:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Newcomen steam engine, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga 05:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Model Farms High School, you will be blocked from editing. +A.0u 05:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Cannibalism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Diff) Ford MF 15:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to St John's College, University of Sydney. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Q ^{T C} 09:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Ultimate Fighter: Team Hughes vs. Team Serra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tuckdogg 01:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Shaun Brown has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 06:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Shaun Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mark Chovain 11:46, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to PRIDE Fighting Championships, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mark Rudan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mark Rudan was changed by 129.78.64.102 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-12T14:00:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Old Boys of Cranbrook School Sydney, you will be blocked from editing. Loopla (talk) 05:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Unit 731, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Drop bear, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AnnaJGrant (talk) 09:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia page, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. Netkinetic ^(t/c/@) 00:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to St Andrew's College, Sydney (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] unblock

Note to reviewing admin. This exact IP was used to evade a block [1] 40 minutes ago. Its unlikely to be collateral damage of the 64 address IP block I performed. MBisanz ^talk 05:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This is a public computer. Please unlbokc. --129.78.64.102 (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Matthew Newton. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Recurring dreams (talk) 06:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Mathematical physics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Veterinary medicine. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Veterinary medicine was changed by 129.78.64.102 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-03T01:27:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. GlassCobra 04:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Mdebets (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to St. Paul's College, Sydney has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Jclemens (talk) 04:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Fetal alcohol syndrome. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Regards, CycloneNimrod ^talk?_contribs? 15:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Editor review/Cyclonenim. J.delanoy^gabsanalyze 16:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Fetal alcohol syndrome, you will be blocked from editing. Regards, CycloneNimrod ^talk?_contribs? 16:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

 —  Tivedshambo  _(t/c) 16:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]