Talk:Superdiamagnetism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses. |
|
[edit] merge/redirect to meissner effect
Hi people; Shouldn't this be merged or a redirect to the meissner effect? Information in both articles is largely redundant. The meissner effect is more complete. Just a thought. Cheers everyone, Pedro Venda. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pjvenda (talk • contribs) 13:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC).
Is "superdiamagnets" and "superconductors" different names for the exact same thing, or is there a physical difference? The article should make it clear whether superdiamagnetism is only a "feature" of superconductivity or completely defines superconductivity. And does a classical perfect diamagnet exhibit the Miessner effect (which classical perfect conductivity fails to explain)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.198.241 (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
