Template talk:Studio60
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Luke Scott
Shouldn't Luke Scott be on the characters page and on the template as a secondary character?
[edit] Link
There's absolutely no reason that an external link should appear in a template. I've removed it, and it should stay gone. EVula 16:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Font face
OK, the title is cleverly set up with the fonts, but does anyone else find the typeface on the rest of the template unreadable? -Joshuapaquin 04:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it's clever but I find the whole thing rates pretty low in terms of readability. Can we change it back to something simpler please? Schi 23:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry. My bad. I'm glad you like the font usage in the title though. lincalinca 04:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Friday Night in Hollywood
This is most definitely not the title of the show. I know the show is introduced as "Live from Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, it's Friday Night in Hollywood!" but that's just what they say. This show has specifically been referred to by the characters as "Studio 60". I mean, if you think about it, SNL says "Live from New York, it's Saturday Night!" but the show isn't called "Saturday Night" is it? I'm changing it. --Harlequin212121 06:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wes Mendell
I have to question Wes Mendell being included as a secondary character. He appeared in the first episode, has not appeared since, and I seriously doubt he'll appear again. —Fumo7887 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree, Wes Mendell is the catalyst that set this whole series in action, without him there'd be nothing to make the show about. He could easilly appear again, maybe to give advice to Danny and Matt? But even if he doesn't he's still earned his spot. --148.61.207.116 01:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- If Judd Hirsch makes another appearance - even one more appearance - I might buy that. Until then, he is a minor character. -Joshuapaquin 01:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Judd Hirsch is due to appear in another two eipsodes, I believe which are the last two in the series (this isn't confirmed anywhere that i can find, but it is mentioned in a couple of different print articles I've read)
- --lincalinca 05:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed that he is listed as a "guest star" in the pilot... that's what makes me question.... —Fumo7887 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Have you ever noticed that Marcia Wallace is a guest on The Simpsons and yet she's been in over 97% of The Simpsons episodes? Trust me, "Guest Star" just means that the actor themself isn't deemed to be on the permanent payroll.
- --lincalinca 12:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- 29.5%, but still a valid point. --69.19.14.24 22:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed that he is listed as a "guest star" in the pilot... that's what makes me question.... —Fumo7887 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- If Judd Hirsch makes another appearance - even one more appearance - I might buy that. Until then, he is a minor character. -Joshuapaquin 01:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Andy Mackinaw
It's nice that Andy has his own page now, but he's only played a supporting role in one episode. I don't think he's quite ready to have his own space in the box. Certainly on the character list, but we can only cram so many people into this box, I think... --148.61.207.116 01:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- I created his page and popped him onto here. i put him on here since he's a catalyst for a great deal more development in the writing team. Plus, he's a permanent cast member now, so his impact will increase as time goes on.
- --lincalinca 05:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Small Text
I'm going to put the small text back in, since the characters it's referring to are minor characters only, not major characters. if you have a problem with viewing the size, increase your basic screen text size, but the usage is just the standard small type, which is frequently used across Wikipedia.
--lincalinca 05:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] removing airdates
It has been suggested that Airdates of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip be merged with List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip episodes which makes a lot of sense since the episode list has the airdates already (aside from canada, but they are all just one day earlier, as mentioned in the main article). The main article also has a lot better info about future international dates than that silly column of 2007s. :) Although merging is pointless, we should just remove the airdates page, redirect it to the episode list, and remove the airdates page link from the studio 60 template and the main article. I'll do all that next year if there are no objections. --Danny Rathjens 09:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Forced into completing this sooner than the merge guidelines recommend since someone speedily deleted the article. --Danny Rathjens 09:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What's wrong with a normal navigation box?
Consistency is better; the colors don't fit with Monobook at least and make the content less readable. æ² ✆ 2007‑02‑10t16:32z
[edit] This Template Should Be Featured
It's beautiful, far better than most templates. Just H 19:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree this is crazy - wait, we have featured template?Daniel()Folsom T|C|U 22:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nice template
Wow guys, this template is the best-looking I've ever seen, it's gorgeous! I love the fontwork in the title! [Mαc Δαvιs] X (How's my driving?) ❖ 21:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Am i on drugs?
this is amazing! I love this box - the best yet! --talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 15:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Templat is great.
Yeah, about three other people said, but still. This template is beautiful. Massive props to whoever made it. Viewtiful Rekk 02:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
