Talk:Stormbringer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Other chaos swords?
I've never heard of there being any other chaos swords than Stormbringer and Mournblade, so I removed this reference. If someone contends this, please cite your source. ---Jackel 21:34, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
>>> This is covered in the books when Elric summons a wall of swords, which has thousands of Stormbringer/Mournblade clones. I am at work now, but will check which book it is in, but it is definitely canon. Turlo Lomon
This article dosn't make it clear as to whether the Deep Purple album was inspired by sword or if its just a coincidence. I don't know if Deep Purple did indeed write the title song in tribute to the works of Micheal Moorcock. But could some one who is in the know please make it clearer?
Why is the bottom portion of this article regarding a computer game player here? There exists probably one character named Stormbringer for every single server of every single online game, is this person truly a legend?
- I was wondering this myself. I say delete the info. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 11:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I removed the reference to the owner of some porn roleplaying group using the handle Stormbringer. If there was a mention of every use of Stormbringer as a username, this article would be twelve pages long. MasterGrazzt 00:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Pages? section
Regarding the Mournblade and Stormbringer possible merge... I feel it should be done. They are both of the same race of demons, and have identical powers, and share the same series of books. There is no reason to seperate them out from each other. Turlo Lomon
- Merge for reasons noted above. This is not a subject worthy of its own entry ---Jackel 16:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's done. I hope I didn't mess it up too bad on my first attempt.Turlo Lomon 03:48, 20 October 2006 (MST)
[edit] The Player section
This section was rightly removed by Jackel due to its lack of relevence to the sword, which is the article's main purpose. I apologise for my previous reversion as I did not notice this.
However, the section's content was in fact genuine. I believe, if the author wishes, that a separate article be made for it. --Domsy 17:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Said author may attempt to create such an entry, but I suspect it will fall within the definition of a vanity article, and be removed. At any rate, genuine or not, it doesn't belong here.---Jackel 18:09, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Truly Awful "Article"
This "article" doesn't have any bona fide sources. And it's 90% spam for commercial products - games, music, books etc. Total wikiality garbage. An opportunity to purchase and little more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.130.40 (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)