User talk:Stevietheman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Stevietheman is a member of WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia. [Become a member] [Project Talk] | |
 |
|
|
Stevietheman is Steve Magruder from Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Stevie is a freelance web programmer who concentrates on server-side programming and relational database design for websites and web applications, mainly using PHP and MySQL (or PostgreSQL).
Steve also administers the Louisville History & Issues discussion board, a "place for Louisville area citizens to discuss our rich local history as well as current political/community issues".
- BY COMMENTING HERE, YOU SHOULD EXPECT THAT I WILL REPLY HERE
PLEASE NOTE: I tend to keep track of my new comments on other user talk pages, so please reply to those on your own talk page instead of here.
 Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Bivouac of the Dead
I created an article on Bivouac of the Dead, but I think it needs better categories? As its related to the War, I thought you may be interested. Any ideas? Just go ahead and apply them; I'm sure you know how. ;) --Bedford 07:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kentucky CLean-up
Thanks for this clean-up. I'm not too familiar with KY or its geography so I figured that tossing it to the Kentucky project would get it in the right place TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 22:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. My pleasure. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 02:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Stevietheman/Louisville
Something in that was causing it to appear in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. It didn't seem that you wanted it deleted and I couldn't see what was causing it. I used the nowiki templates to ensure that it didn't get deleted until you could check it out. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 05:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I meant to delete that too. Thanks. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 06:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] LanternLight
Yes, it is obnoxious what LanternLight is doing, but I don't think there is an official policy that states that you cannot remove other people's comments from your own talk page (correct me if I'm wrong). The fact that he is removing yours and my comments is proof enough that he has read them. I reverted him on Rick Barry and I left a comment on his talk page. Even though he removed my comment, he did not re-revert me on the article. I think this edit war on his talk page is pretty pointless. Yes he is being rude, but I don't see any major violation of Wikipedia rules here. Bash Kash (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree regarding the rules, but that doesn't stop me from trying to impress upon him that what he is doing is wrong, for human social reasons. What he doesn't violate in rules, he is violating in community. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:54, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Ok, but I guarantee you that he will revert again the next time he logs on, and then what? You respond with an additional revert, and this becomes one of the lamest edit wars - all for the sake of "human social reasons." Please think for a second how utterly pointless this is. Bash Kash (talk) 02:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- I would advise not blowing this up out of proportion. I stopped after a couple reverts and this is old news to me at this point. On top of that, my position is correct and this individual needed to know the score. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 05:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
-
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:ChurchillDownsSpires.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ChurchillDownsSpires.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:20, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:EarXtacy.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:EarXtacy.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 03:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:EarXtacy.jpg
I've gone ahead and speedied Image:EarXtacy.jpg despite your recent changes to the image description page. I've deleted the image because while you have indicated a change in license, the source image still indicates that it is under a noncommercial-only license, which is incompatible with Wikipedia.
If you are the copyright holder of the image, and have access to the Flickr account, change it there to a Wikipedia-compatible license and then you shouldn't have any problems re-uploading. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- What recent changes? Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 04:47, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Don't worry, I took care of taking another picture. Image:EarXtacy.JPG should suffice (it's the better of two pics I took of it.)--Bedford Pray 23:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Warning vandals
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Cheeseburger: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --AW (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Already know about this. I really don't have the time to look up templates for each case. I just revert the vandalism and move on -- all I have time for. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
