Steven E. Jones

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on the: 9/11 Truth Movement
Articles
Conspiracy theories Advance knowledge Controlled demolition United Flight 93 9/11 opinion polls
Participants
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed Ed Asner Kevin Barrett Robert M. Bowman Andreas von Bülow Immortal Technique Mos Def A.K. Dewdney Rosie O'Donnell James Fetzer David Ray Griffin Sander Hicks Jim Hoffman David Icke Alex Jones Steven E. Jones David Lynch Annie Machon Michael Meacher Thierry Meyssan Ray McGovern Willie Nelson Sean Penn Morgan Reynolds Paul Craig Roberts William Rodriguez Michael Ruppert Peter Dale Scott David Shayler Charlie Sheen Martin Sheen Cindy Sheehan Webster G. Tarpley Jesse Ventura Jimmy Walter Barrie Zwicker
Organizations
9/11 Citizens Watch Family Steering Committee Jersey Girls
Films
9/11: Press for Truth Loose Change
Books
9/11: The Big Lie The CIA and September 11 The New Pearl Harbor The Terror Timeline The War on Freedom This box: view • talk • edit

Steven Earl Jones is an American physicist. For most of his career, Jones was known mainly for his work on muon-catalyzed fusion. In the fall of 2006, amid controversy surrounding his work on the collapse of the World Trade Center, he was relieved of his teaching duties and placed on paid leave from Brigham Young University. On October 20, 2006, he announced his retirement. He holds that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition during the September 11 attacks.

Contents 1 Education 2 Research interests and background 3 Cold fusion 4 WTC destruction controversy 5 Scholars for 9/11 Truth 6 Affiliations 7 Recognition and awards 8 References 9 See also 10 External links 10.1 Links covering Steven Jones' Cold Fusion research 10.2 Links covering Steven Jones' 9/11 research

[edit] Education

Jones earned his bachelor's degree in physics, magna cum laude, from Brigham Young University in 1973, and his Ph.D. in physics from Vanderbilt University in 1978. Jones conducted his Ph.D. research at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (from 1974 to 1977), and post-doctoral research at Cornell University and the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility.^[1]

[edit] Research interests and background

Jones conducted research at the Idaho National Laboratory, in Arco, Idaho where, from 1979 to 1985, he was a senior engineering specialist. He was principal investigator for experimental muon-catalyzed fusion from 1982 to 1991 for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects. From 1990 to 1993, Jones studied fusion in condensed matter physics and deuterium under U.S. Department of Energy and Electric Power Research Institute sponsorship. Jones also collaborated in experiments at other physics labs, including TRIUMF (Vancouver, British Columbia), KEK (Tsukuba, Japan), and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at Oxford University.

Jones' interests also extend to archaeometry, solar energy,^[2][3] and, like many professors at BYU, archaeology and the Book of Mormon.^[4] For example, he has sought radiocarbon dating evidence of the existence of pre-Columbian horses in the Americas,^[5] and has interpreted archaeological evidence from the ancient Mayans as supporting his faith's belief that Jesus Christ visited America.^[6]

[edit] Cold fusion

In the mid-1980s, Jones and other BYU scientists worked on what he then referred to as Cold Nuclear Fusion in a Scientific American article, but is today known as muon-catalyzed fusion to avoid confusion. Muon-catalyzed fusion was a field of some interest in the 1980s, but its low energy output appears to be unavoidable (due to alpha-muon sticking losses). Jones led a research team that in 1986 achieved 150 fusions per muon (average), releasing over 2,600 MeV of fusion energy per muon, a record which still stands.^[7]

Around 1985 Jones then became interested in the anomalous concentration of helium-3 found in the gases escaping from volcanoes. He hypothesized that the high pressures in the Earth's interior might make fusion more likely, and began a series of experiments on what he referred to as piezofusion, or high-pressure fusion. In order to characterize the reactions, Jones designed and built a neutron counter able to accurately measure the tiny numbers of neutrons being produced in his experiments. The counter suggested a small amount of fusion was going on. Jones said the result suggested at least the possibility of fusion, though the process was unlikely to be useful as an energy source.

Pons and Fleischmann (P&F) started their work around the same time. Their work was brought to Jones' attention when they applied for research funding from the Department of Energy and they passed their proposal along to Jones for peer review. Realizing their work was very similar, Jones and P&F agreed to release their papers to Nature on the same day, March 24, 1989. However, P&F announced their results at a press event the day before. Jones faxed his paper to Nature.^[8]

A New York Times article says that while peer reviewers were quite critical of Pons and Fleishchmann's research they did not apply such criticism to Jones' much more modest, theoretically supported findings. Although critics insisted that his results likely stemmed from experimental error,^[9] most of the reviewing physicists indicated that he was a careful scientist. Other research and experiments confirmed his findings.^[10]

[edit] WTC destruction controversy

On September 22, 2005 Jones presented his views on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and World Trade Center 7 at a BYU seminar attended by about 60 people. Pointing to the speed and symmetry of the collapses, the characteristics of dust jets, and reports of molten metal in the debris, Jones suggested that the evidence defies the mainstream collapse theory and favors explosive demolition. He called for further scientific investigation to test the controlled demolition hypothesis and the release of all relevant data by the government.^[11] Shortly after the seminar, Jones placed a paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" on the Physics department web site.

He subsequently defended the research twice more at BYU,^{[citation needed]} also at Idaho State University, Utah Valley State College, University of Colorado at Boulder and University of Denver, the Utah Academy of Science, Sonoma State University, University of California at Berkeley, and the University of Texas at Austin. ^{[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]}

Jones' paper has been the center of controversy both for its content and its claims to scientific rigor.^[19] Jones' early critics included members of BYU's engineering faculty;^[20] shortly after he made his views public, the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the faculty of structural engineering issued statements in which they distanced themselves from Jones' work. They noted that Jones' "hypotheses and interpretations of evidence were being questioned by scholars and practitioners," and expressed doubts about whether they had been "submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review."^[21]

Some of Jones' colleagues have defended his work on 9/11 to varying degrees,^[22] and Project Censored lists his 9/11 research among the top mainstream media censored stories of 2007.^[23]

Jones maintains that the paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication within a book "9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out" by D.R. Griffin^[24], however it has never been published in an independent peer-reviewed journal. The papers was also posted on the Internet site of the "Journal of 9/11 Studies", which was co-founded by Jones for the purpose of "covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001" and which is co-edited by him.^[25] The paper also appears in Global Outlook,^[26] a magazine "seeking to reveal the truth About 9/11"^[27] and in a volume of essays edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.^[28]

On September 7, 2006, Jones removed his paper from BYU's website at the request of administrators and was placed on paid leave. ^[29]

The university cited its concern about the "increasingly speculative and accusatory nature" of Jones' work and the concern that perhaps it had "not been published in appropriate scientific venues" as reasons for putting him under review. The review was to have been conducted at three levels: BYU administration, the College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, and the Physics Department.^[30]

Jones' placement on paid leave drew criticism from the American Association of University Professors and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Both organizations are long time critics of BYU's record on academic freedom.^[31] Jones "welcomed the review" because he hoped it would "encourage people to read his paper for themselves," however the review was abandoned when Jones elected to retire, effective January 1, 2007.^[32]

Jones has been interviewed by mainstream news sources and has made a number of public appearances. While Jones has urged caution in drawing conclusions,^[33] his public comments have suggested a considerable degree of certainty about both the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center and the culpability of rogue agents working within the U.S. government.^[34] In one interview, he asserted that the attacks were "an 'inside job', puppeteered by the neoconservatives in the White House to justify the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries, inflate military spending, and expand Israel."^[35] His name is often mentioned in reporting about 9/11 conspiracy theories.^[36]

In April of 2008, Jones, along with four other authors, published a letter questioning the NIST findings in The Open Civil Engineering Journal, titled, 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction'^[37].

[edit] Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Jones was a founding member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth and has served as co-chair, with James H. Fetzer, since its inception. From mid-November 2006 until the end of that year, he, Fetzer and a series of other researchers and individuals engaged in an open dispute about the direction the organization should take. Fetzer has said Jones wants to suppress some alternative theories about 9/11, including those of Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds involving the destruction of the WTC by directed energy weapons, and the so-called "no-plane" theories.^[38] Jones has said he has examined the mini-nukes hypothesis and delineated empirical reasons for rejecting it,^[39] and that he invites further discussion and response. Jones and about 4/5 of the scholars left the organization to establish Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, dedicated to 9/11 research using the scientific method. By mid-2008, that organization had grown to over 500 members.

[edit] Affiliations

Jones had been co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth up until December 5, 2006. Following a dispute with co-chair James Fetzer over the direction the organization was taking, Jones resigned his membership and joined Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice.

Jones is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Jones has been described as "a devout Mormon and, until recently, a faithful supporter of George W. Bush."^[19] However, Jones himself noted that he did not vote for Bush/Cheney, and he called for their impeachments beginning at large conferences in Chicago and Los Angeles in June 2006.^[40][41]

Jones is co-editor of Journal of 9/11 Studies.^[42]

[edit] Recognition and awards

• 1968, David O. McKay Scholarship at BYU; National Merit Scholar^[1]
• 1973-1978 Tuition Scholarship and Research Fellowship at Vanderbilt University
• 1989 Outstanding Young Scholar Award (BYU); Best of What's New for 1989 (Popular Science); Creativity Prize (Japanese Creativity Society)
• 1990 BYU Young Scholar Award; Annual Lecturer, BYU Chapter of Sigma Xi

[edit] References

[edit] See also

• Collapse of the World Trade Center
• Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
• 9/11 Truth Movement
• Jim Hoffman
• David Ray Griffin

[edit] External links

• BYU energy research
• Brookings.com - 'Cold Fusion'
• The BYU Solar Funnel Cooker/Cooler and Solar Cooker on Project Gutenberg
• Physicist Challenges Official 9-11 Story - 'Top 25 Censored Stories of 2007,' Project Censored, Nov, 2006.
• Podcast of WTC demolition debate between engineer Leslie Robertson and physicist Steven Jones on KGNU radio, Oct. 26, 2006.
• Analysis of the World Trade Center Destruction by Steven Jones, video recording of the one day conference "Lifting the fog: the scientific method applied to the world trade center disaster" held at the University of California, Berkeley Campus, November 11, 2006.

[edit] Links covering Steven Jones' Cold Fusion research

• Infinite Energy Magazine article covering Cold Fusion with mention of Jones' contributions
• WIRED Magazine article covering Cold Fusion with mention of Jones' contributions

[edit] Links covering Steven Jones' 9/11 research

• Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice
• 'Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?' by Steven E. Jones
• 'Answers to Objections and Questions' PDF presentation by Steven E. Jones
• Gravois, John (2006). A theory that just won't die. News. CanWest Interactive. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
• 'Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction', by Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, & James R. Gourley. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp.35-40.

v • d • e 9/11 conspiracy theories Major theories Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center · 9/11 advance-knowledge debate · Flight 93 theories Notable proponents and supporters Kevin Barrett · Robert M. Bowman · Andreas von Bülow · James H. Fetzer · David Ray Griffin · Sander Hicks · Jim Hoffman · David Icke · Alex Jones · Steven E. Jones · Lyndon LaRouche · Thierry Meyssan · Rosie O'Donnell · William Rodriguez · Michael Ruppert · Peter Dale Scott · Charlie Sheen · Martin Sheen · Webster G. Tarpley · Barrie Zwicker · Warren Cuccurullo Groups 9/11 Truth Movement · 9/11 Citizens Watch Films 911: In Plane Site · Loose Change · 9/11: Press for Truth Books 9/11: The Big Lie · The CIA and September 11 · The New Pearl Harbor · The Terror Timeline · The War on Freedom