Talk:Silhouette
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mentioning IPod here is totally irrelevant. 12:30, 5 January 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.90.32.87 (talk • contribs)
- I didn't see this comment here before I added a new section mentioning iPod commercials. Why are they irrelevant? --MaskedSheik 05:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Paper?
This article needs to mention the history of cut-paper silhouettes. ―BenFrantzDale 06:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
it also needs to mention in the pop culture thing that in an escape the fate song its mentioned.
[edit] Needs a rewrite
This is just such an awful article, I cannot believe it hasn't been dealt with yet. There are bits repeated, frequent grammar mistakes, irrelevant sections etc. If nobody else wants to, I'll have a go in the next few days. - Ultravisitor 18:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] More clarity in introduction
I think that while the origin and artistic meaning of this word are important, there should be a note in the introduction about the silhouette's basic nature and how it is formed in nature. In particular, the article "shadow" defines it in relation to a silhouette in its introduction.
[edit] silhouette
I do not assert, but it is my understanding, that until the photograph, the silhouette was the most accurate form of graphic portraiture. I doubt the assertion that it was popular because it was cheap. Larboard 03:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clean the cliche?
--Storkian aka iSoroush Talk 22:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
