Template talk:Self-published
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I appreciate there is a very slight difference between this and {{Primarysources}}, however would a merge be possible? Addhoc 15:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think there should be. Primary sources is for when those are the only cited sources; this is for when there's an improper but not necessarily exclusive reliance on them. You could have an article that uses only primary sources and is ineligible for this template if it uses them properly and only for basic descriptive claims. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
This author is a prolific journalist and his life history is supported by countless references in published material - both the book and contributors panel cited are sufficient.
[edit] Category
Isn't a little bit off these article are put in Accuracy Dispustes rather NPOV Disputes? Would anyone object to a change?--BirgitteSB 14:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)