User talk:M7

From the Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can change

[change] 198.234.208.176 and 198.234.208.177

They're just some kids messing around. Don't bother getting a block, they're only doing it on their own pages and they haven't removed the delete notices. Archer7 18:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Block them! They've moved out! Archer7 18:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

[change] We're almost done

That's okay, between the folks cleaning up, We're almost there now... ALl that remains is to delete the junk... Sorry I accidentally rolled back your comment, I will fix that Blockinblox 14:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Let me know if you see either Slobo or Blunkett vandalising again... Slobo continued right up to the minute I warned him, didn't even have to block, but he will probably end up being banned permanently anyway when Neto finds out!! Blockinblox 15:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[change] Thanks...

...for letting me know I missed one. Freshstart 22:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[change] Babel boxes

The Babel boxes have been revamped to conform to a new accepted scheme. Please recreate your boxes or change the references to fit with the new standard format. The old boxes will be deleted. Ask me any questions on my talk page. Thanks! --Cromwellt|talk 01:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[change] Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been awarded a Barnstar! For your great work on fighting against vandalism I, TBC, award you this barnstar. --TBCΦtalk? 07:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

--TBCΦtalk? 07:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] Subst

Hello, M7, please subst your templates on talk pages, like vandals' ones. For example:

{{subst:Test}}

Thank you for your co-operation! :)-- Tdxiang @ 10:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Alright, each of us has a preference and I respect that, so... sure!-- Tdxiang @ 10:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

ciao, M7 grazie per il tuo interessamento sono dario_vet, ma dicono che non si possono tenere firme a mo' di template....--vector ^_^ (talk 19:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] politics

Are you more interested in politics, or creating an encyclopedia in Simple English? -- Netoholic @ 19:40, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Users are not your employees, nor they can be treated like you are doing lately. This is just my humble opinion, you can still continue ignoring it, but I feel that a dialogue is much better than mute contrast. --M7 19:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] sysop

Thanks for your help, but we're all set now.

Please stop asking for emergency sysop access so often. Some things -can- wait. The accounts you blocked were only editing a single page. You're also missing some finer points about the admin rights, such as leaving personal information in the deletion log and deleting one of our deletion templates, Template:Non. -- Netoholic @ 00:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about the personal information in the logs, I've asked Tim Starling to remove the data from the database. Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] Nelson Mandela

Thank you for telling me my mistake. I'm sorry, I didn't know. :). PullToOpen ^Talk 02:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] Sysop

What would it take for me to become a sysop here?? --SunStar Net 14:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[change] Warned?

Why the fuck was I warned? I don't believe I did any fucking think that deserved vandalism credentials. --Railer SE10 23:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Request to Stewards

I've posted a Request that is specifically addressed to Stewards, since I'm not sure that you can hold a veto right against sysop candidates on simple.wikipedia. Please review it and express your opinion. Thank you, M/ M7 22:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

What "veto right" are you talking about? I've been away from Simple for about a week and am just now catching up on things like admin requests. I did not promote Tdxiang because he had only 8 of 11 votes (72%) and I used my judgement also based on his recent activity which should show he is not ready for adminship. Maybe later, but not now. As for other admin requests, I am looking into them. I have contacted Vector by email, per my procedure to verify that his email access works. Eptalon's request has only ben up for about one day, so I am not ready to promote yet.

I think you need to stop trolling me and getting involved in politics. You are making a lot of assumptions about me, and getting many of them wrong. -- Netoholic @ 22:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Thank you

Dear M7, grazie per votare (thamk you for voting)! Even though my adminship did not pass this time, I do not hold anything against Netoholic. I would like to thank you for your support and your comments. Grazie, il mio amico (Thanks a heap, friend!)!-- Tdxiang 02:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Edit wars are bad

Hello, M7. Vandals want attention. Therefore fighting edit wars is bad. So far, only 2 pages have been affected. It is probably wiser to let the person wear out his/her 4 warnings, and then post ot the admin board. -- Eptalon 22:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Vandal

Good... I know how to do a range block... This guy is disturbed... Okay, someone got him! Thanks so much! Blockinblox 22:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Nothing

nothing...you aren't a troll --vector ^_^ (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Bureaucratship

Hi M7, thank you for your invitation to run for bureaucratship. However, I've only been a simplewiki admin for a month or so, and I don't think it would be fair for me to run for bureaucratship at such an early stage, so I regretfully cannot accept your invitation. But thanks anyway :) Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[change] Steward

Congratulations on becoming a steward! PullToOpen^Talk 01:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[change] Impersonating, etc

Hello M7. Personally, I am fine with you blocking such accounts on sight. IMO, you should be fine with doing one day blocks. To be sure, however, check with one of our Bureaucrats (esp, for infinite blocks on perceived vandal-only accounts). Also, make sure each blocked user gets informed. There is a block template you can use for that. Archer7, and Blockinblox. To my knowledge, Archer7 is the currently more active of the two. --Eptalon 17:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I have infinitely blocked the offending ones. This was relatively easy as I see them as inappropriate usernames. So, go ahead, and do any further (infinite, but leave account creation open) blocks, when you see more of them. --Eptalon 17:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[change] Talk:Opus Dei

Hello, and sorry for bothering you. An anonymous user left a Italian-language comment on Opus Dei (which some see as a sect), on Talk:opus Dei. Could you take 5 mins to completley revise (my probably totally insufficient) Italian, os that we have an accurate translation of that comment? - Thanks --Eptalon 00:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for proofreading :) --Eptalon 00:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[change] re:Sysop

Congratulations, you're now an administrator. I suggest you take a quick re-read of our policies and guidelines, and make sure you check your email regularly. If you ever need any help at all, you can always ask me or another administrator. Ma penso che non ce ne sia molto di bisogno :-) Buon Lavoro e grazie --vector ^_^ (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! Welcome to the admin team! · Tygartl1^·talk·

[change] {{test}}

Just to let you know, whenever you use {{test}} or {{welcome}} or any of those kinds of templates, you should put "subst:" so it becomes {{subst:test}}. Thanks.--Werdan7^{T @} 00:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[change] Age of Enlightenment

Can you delete the page "Age of Enlightenment". Thanks, Isis 23:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Never mind Isis 03:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[change] RfCU

Dear M7,

I have nominated you for checkuser access on WP:RFA. Please complete the Candidate's acceptance section.

Best of all, - Huji ^reply 14:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I will also send a message on your talk page on It WP. - Huji ^reply 14:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, I was kind of uncertain... but since you've nominated only two people, and the minimum required by the policy is two people, then I accept. --M7 15:06, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You are experienced about this. You can help a lot. It won't be a problem if you don't check that regularly (for example, if you check twice a week, it would be fine, I guess). Indeed, you can help the other CU (or CUs) and check their use of the tool as well. - Huji ^reply 16:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

As you can image, I've several pages of some wikies on my watchlist. To add another one (Request for CU, may be) is not a great effort. But the choice is up to simple.wiki community, of course. If there is another nominee available, he is going to have my full support. --M7 16:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You now have checkUser access. Please subscribe to checkUser-l, the private mailing list for checkUsers. If you use IRC, you can contact Dmcdevit or Jdforrester for access to the private freenode channel #wikimedia-checkuser. Thanks. —Pathoschild 18:15:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[change] Re:Trusting Users

Hello M7,

On your RfCU, I supported you since you were already a steward, I had the 100% confidence on supporting you. For Creol, I admire him in many ways and trust him as a sysop, but not completely as a checkuser. As I stated on his RfCU, Creol has only sysop rights here; and makes several (or a few) edits in other wikis. That's my only problem on not to support him. Take user Lar for example, he's a sysop and checkuser in en wiki, commons (+bureaucrat), and meta which is enough proof that he is capable of being a CU. But Creol lacks that kind of proof (I don't really know how to express this on how I want to).

Well I hope you understand my concern (if I'm sounding very weird). Peace;) --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} 22:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[change] CU access

Congrats for your new responsibilities! I've created Wikipedia:Request for checkuser for the same reason. Best, - Huji ^reply 19:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

[change] You are around!

I believe you appear here more than before, from when you've become a local CU. I just wanted to stop by and say "It is always good to have you around". - Huji ^reply 19:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[change] Recent Block

At the English Wikipedia, they block users for 3 days for messing around with talk pages and stuff. -Razorflame 17:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[change] RFA thanks

Dear M7,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA which closed successfully with 19 supports and 1 oppose which didn't count since it was made by a sock of a banned user. If you have any comments, concerns, or any suggestions for me as an Administrator, feel free to leave a note on my talkpage. Thank you.  Lights  talk  13:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[change] Friend

Hello M7. I'm just wanting to tell you that I've added you to my list of friends here on Simple English Wikipedia. I hope that you will do the same for me. Cheers! Razorflame (contributions) Talk 23:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[change] Protection of Page World War II

Hey M7, can I request protection of the page World War II based upon the fact that it has been a very high risk page (looking at it's edit history)? Thanks Razorflame 22:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

My internet broke as I was signing my comment to Creol :) Razorflame 23:03, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[change] 75.71.32.203 block

Just wanted to point out that there seems to be an issue with this block. The last two warnings issued to the IP were actually given after reverts of not just good faith edits, but of totally correct edits. The talk page covers the edits fully. The editor reverting apparently did not fully check the edits and just assumed it was further vandalism prior to warning the user and reporting the incident. As it was only a three hour block, it is pretty much a null point now, but wanted to inform you. -- Creol(talk) 03:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[change] huh?

why? Oo IamAre 21:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

???IamAre 22:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[change] Welcome back!

It's nice to see you back on the Simple English Wikipedia after such a long absense! Here's to you coming back! Cheers! Razorflame 16:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[change] User:Me: +44 01278 651 973

I'm not sure if you intentionally did this, but when you blocked User:Me: +44 01278 651 973, you disabled account creation and when the user requested unblock, you told him/her to register again. With the account creation disabled, the user can't create an account with an acceptable username. I'd suggest you allow account creation when you block an unacceptable username, unless its obviously a vandal or a sockpuppet. Cheers-- Lights  talk  15:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[change] Hi

Could you see this please? Thanks. SwirlBoy39 14:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] RfA/RFCU

After seeing all of the mishaps that have been going on at the WP:RFA page involving my 7th and completely unwanted nomination, I hereby give you or any checkusers consent to do a checkuser on me if you so choose to to disprove that I am related to Benniguy. Razorflame 17:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't benniguy who nominated you. 201.45.216.114 (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandalism revertion of 217.71.145.15. Took me a while to work out what happened when I got the new messages banner, though... :-D Nanochip08 ^Microchip08 on_WHEELS  Lol! Random colour! 10:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Rash of creations

Just a question, but did you get the IP's for these users blocked? Razorflame 15:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks like you haven't gotten all of them blocked yet :P Razorflame 15:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

203.144.1xx.xxx could be range blocked, I think. Razorflame 16:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks like there is another impersonation account User:Cwib. Please block. Cheers, Razorflame 15:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Done! Archer7 - talk 15:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Cwib needs to be added to the regexes of username blacklist. Razorflame 16:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Thanks

Thanks for the recent blocks of those accounts. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 15:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. --Gwib ^-(talk)- 16:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Barnstar!

Congratulations: You have been awarded a Barnstar! For tirelessly and ceaselessly blocking so many vandal accounts today. TheWolf 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You seriously deserve this. TheWolf 17:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] Re: (mail)

I always read mail, but I prefer answering on relevant talk pages. --M7 (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I think that i am not allowed to discuss it openly, due to privacy rules and implications. IuseRosary? ^(talk) 14:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Of course you can write anything on my mailbox, and I will not reveal any private letter. Please remember that I generally will not mail back, if necessary you will find a generic answer on the relevant talk page. --M7 (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I've also emailed some other admin's alerting them of my new found infomation about this incident. I will email you again when i go back on my email account. Thanks IuseRosary? ^(talk) 16:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[change] My RFA

Thank you for your recent support in my RFA which closed successfully with 26 supports and a lone oppose. I hope to serve the community to the best of my ability. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)