User talk:Audriusa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Enigma machine
Thanks very much for providing the picture of the Swiss Enigma; cheers! — Matt Crypto 18:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you!
Here is a (late) thank-you for removeing the um. . .(is it vandalism?) catagorizing from my user page. I love having my user page reverted before I even see it! thanks a ton --Banana04131 01:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sorry
Next time be sure to sign in before archiving your talk page, otherwise it looks like an anonymous vandal. :D. — Mar. 15, '06 [14:07] <freakofnurxture|talk>
[edit] Terminatorius blanking of IP user talk pages
- Is there a policy authorizing the blanking of IP talk pages after a period of inactivity?Wuzzy 18:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- There is definitely no policy for removing useful notes such as
{{sharedip|Cambridge Area Schools}}(User talk:195.144.131.12). Does this bot have en:Wikipedia:Bots approval? 48 hours or even 10 days seems way to short for en: even if everybody agreed on blanking pages. I gave the bot a stop message until it's clear there was consensus on its behavior. Femto 20:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)- Ok, waiting for consensus. All bot changes are now manually reverted. Audriusa 22:43, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- I really don't think that this bot is a good idea. Some IPs are chronic vandalis, and when I'm dealing with them it's very useful for me to be able to see that. When I'm going to an IP talk page to add a vandalism warning and I see that that IP has 20 previous warnings stretching back over six months, I handle it differently than if the IP has received one or no warnings. Hbackman 23:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Please see discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Counter Vandalism Unit#Terminatorius bot blanks warnings Wuzzy 00:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)WP:BRFA#User:Terminatorius - automated blanking of the vandal anonymous IP talk pages Wuzzy 00:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Consensus has been reached
I am convinced by the arguments and do not plan to continue with this idea. Audriusa 08:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- You were well-intentioned and you obviously put a lot of effort into the Terminatorius bot, and carefully explained what you did, and incorporated the innovative "Emergency stop" feature. So, thank you, even if the bot will not go ahead. 14:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Images
[1] You have a creative way of using images, I must say. :) Femto 15:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Username signature in Wikipedia articles
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please, however, refrain from using your username signature in Wikipedia articles. Username signatures are used for talk (discussion) pages only. --Kurt 02:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- I did not have intention to put the username signature into any article. Where did you find it? Audriusa 06:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re Image:ElectricLocomotiveCabine.jpg
Could you please add details as to the locomotive type and alter caption in electric locomotive accordingly? Mangoe 17:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] River Image
I really, really, liked the image of the start of a river at the site of the melting glacier, on the page River. However, a couple of questions: 1) what river is this? 2) did you do the superimposing of the closeup image yourself? If so, I would encourage you to redo it. Let me know if you can redo it, before I bother explaining what I think would make it better. No matter what, I liked it (I have a weird fetish for headwaters). Unschool 05:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Boston Tea Party
Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [2]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:PlantsInArvenbul1400m.jpg
Hi Audrius, Your picture shows Astrantia major. Cheers --87.165.85.73 17:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC) (de:Benutzer:Density)
-
- Oh, thanks! Audriusa 19:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Transistors in Diode Detection
Hi Audriusa, I removed it because several electrical engineers couldn't understand it. Someone asked me what it meant and I (an EE) couldn't figure it out. I asked someone else smarter than me and they couldn't either. So if you add it back, please write it so it is easier for people to understand. If people don't understand, you don't get your point across.
If you intend to imply that a transistor in reverse bias (to the zener point) is a better detector than a comparable diode in comparable bias, then I think I can convince you otherwise. But I could not understand whether that is what you intended to imply.
Also, I think there may be some words out of place in your contribution.
Thanks. John 02:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dry rot
Nice addition of Serpula image.Heliocybe 18:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Source code request
You offered to make the source code of your Java Terminatorius bot available to any admin on request. Could you email it to me? Thanks. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- OK Audriusa 19:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Steponas darius.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Steponas darius.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lituanica.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lituanica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stasys girenas.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stasys girenas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lituanica.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Lituanica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
