Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highfields School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Highfields School
Notability issues. Completing process initiated by anon -- no vote/opinion from me. The JPStalk to me 20:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep This is a British secondary school. Most British secondary schools seem to have pages. If there is suddenly a wikipedia policy not to cover secondary schools then there are a lot of pages to be deleted. All the others in Derbyshire to start with. The anon user who listed this for deletion has only initiated this single AfD - is he saying that all the other comprehensives in England are more notable? If so, then Highfields is notable as the least notable secondary school in the country! I'm not saying it's a good page - far from it - just that it should be improved, not deleted. Rachel Pearce (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose ie keep Anon. user with no supporting argument proposes that a secondary school is not notable despite its lack of anonymity, references and history. I have added a more recent academic note and aplogise that the school article seems to focus on discipline minutae. (Please feel free to delate the worst examples!). Oppose as notable. Victuallers (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, despite the issues mentioned, article subject meets the presumption of notability at WP:N. – Zedla (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - if going beyond generally believing secondary schools notable, I'd say the racism study helps to confer it in this case. matt91486 (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, I think that if all un-notable schools were deleted there would be less than a quarter of the good quality, informative articles about schools and that would be a real loss. Highfields (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
