User:SunCreator/AFD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is currently on a "semi-wikibreak" for an unspecific time.

User page	Talk Page	To Do List	INFO	AFD	Control Panel	More

This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself.

Wikipedia guidelines Content Conflict of interest Don't copy sources Disambiguation Don't create hoaxes Patent nonsense Reliable sources User page Article Inclusion Notability Classification Subpages Cats, lists, templates Lists Categories Editing Be bold Build the web Edit summary Article size Discussion Talk page guidelines Sign on talk pages Behavior Etiquette Assume good faith Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Don't bite the newcomers Do not "game the system" Style Manual of Style See also policies

Wikipedia policy Behavioral standards Bots Civility Editing policy No legal threats No personal attacks Ownership of articles Sock puppetry Three-revert rule User accounts Vandalism Notability Inclusion guidelines Academics Books Films Music Numbers Organizations & companies People Web content Active proposals Aircraft Criminal acts Fiction Places and transportation Schools Serial works Streets and roads Toys and games See also Common deletion outcomes

Wikipedia policy Article standards Neutral point of view Verifiability No original research Biographies of living persons Working with others Civility Consensus No personal attacks Dispute resolution No legal threats Global principles What Wikipedia is not Ignore all rules Checkuser pages Requests: Unlisted • IP check • On hold Archives: Main • Older • IP checks • Unsorted Clerk pages Clerk Overview • Noticeboard • Procedures Shortcut This page can be quickly accessed through: WP:RFCU/C/P

Common decisions & arguments Deletion (xFD) Arguments to avoid Common outcomes Overcategorisation Adminship (RfA) & Bureaucratship (RfB) Arguments to avoid Arbitration (Arbcom) How to present a case Past decisions Proposals & policy Perennial proposals Deletion discussions Deletion today Deletion yesterday Articles (by category) Templates Images & media Categories (active) User categories Stub types Redirects Miscellany Deletion review Deletion policy Process - log - tools Guide - Admin guide

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: AFD – news, books, scholar WP:NWP:CLSWP:LISTWP:RS

Purge server cache

Contents 1 Roger Tamraz 2 Stephanie Biddle 3 Red Light Junkie 4 Donna Upson 5 1801 California Street 6 The Curve (shopping mall)

[edit] Roger Tamraz

Roger Tamraz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

This article, which seems to be written with negative intent towards the subject, is sourced only by court documents and other primary sources. Notability not established. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stephanie Biddle

Stephanie Biddle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

The author (Clinix1 (talk · contribs)) contested a seconded PROD for failure to meet WP:BIO criteria with sufficient WP:RS ... the author also appears to be a WP:SOCK of the subject (Stephanie biddle (talk · contribs)), who has extensively also edited the article. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 04:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red Light Junkie

Red Light Junkie (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Neologism of no notability. No sources, and google hits do not show this usage for this term Jclemens (talk) 04:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete unless sourced. In the absence of sources to the contrary, this appears to be a purely local non-notable description of the phenomenon. – iridescent 04:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete This seems very original research to me, not just because of the lack of sources, or the use of words such as "many", but because if it is indeed a colloquialism (or neologism) of limited use (as the article purports) then I doubt such sources would exist at all. Calgary (talk) 04:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete At the most this would be a dictionary entry. I notice that the article is about the expression, not about the "red light junkies" themselves. The info, which I am sure is true, should be mentioned in Volunteer firefighter. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Much of the content of the article is already at Volunteer_firefighter#Emergency response and that which is not already present yet reliably sourcacble--which in my estimation probably does not include the term itself--would indeed be more appropriately included there. Jclemens (talk) 04:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Donna Upson

Donna Upson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Fails WP:BIO. She's a failed mayoral candidate. Not at all notable. First nom. Delete GreenJoe 03:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete I agree, I don't see how there's substantial coverage in enough depth, detail, or quantity to establish notability. If she hasn't done anything notable, and she hasn't recieved significant coverage by multiple independent sources, then I don't see evidence of notability. Calgary (talk) 04:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Failed candidates at the civic level are not notable. Resolute 04:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 1801 California Street

1801 California Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Also similar articles:

707 17th Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

555 17th Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

633 17th Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

621 17th Street (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Five very unremarkable stubs. Reminds me of WP:EVERYTHING. Same info is included in List of tallest buildings in Denver so stubs can be re-created as notability comes in. Potatoswatter (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

• Delete all Amazingly unremarkable buildings that don't have any info for them besides the fact that they're buildings. Deathawk (talk) 02:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Delete all - the only argument to keep is that they are tall. But List of tallest buildings in Denver looks to have that covered --T-rex 03:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep all The historically-tallest buildings in a major US city should be considered notable. Even if it turns out these articles can't be expanded (which I doubt is the case), we can still convert these into redirects, so no deletion tools are necessary. Zagalejo^^^ 05:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Curve (shopping mall)

The Curve (shopping mall) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View AfD)

Wikipedia:Notability Mardetanha ^talk 01:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

• Strong Keep one of the most noted shopping malls in Malaysia. Its neighbours like Ikano Power Centre has an article. 1 Utama a shopping mall nearby also has an article. Gavatron (talk) 01:48 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Delete It opened in 2005 and only reference is link to its homepage. Preceding argument is WP:OTHERSTUFF plus the word "strong" tacked on. Potatoswatter (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - A mall of this size should be notable. The article does need more sources, but I can assume that they can be found, however given the common word, and a foreign language it's a bit hard to check. Still it looks doable [1] --T-rex 03:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Keep a mall this size is surely notable. JJL (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)