Talk:Severn Beach Line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Severn Beach Line is currently a good article nominee. Anyone who has not contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article, as outlined on the nominations page.
To start the review process, follow this link to create a dedicated subpage for the review. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.) Date: 11:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
 |
The article on Severn Beach Line is supported by the Bristol WikiProject, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Photo | At least one photograph is included in this article |
| Infobox | This article has an infobox |
| Stats | This article needs statistical information to be added |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed by the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
 |
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Severn Beach Line. |
[edit] Infobox
Not very pretty. But it doesn't appear any other railway line has this type of info box. Should it be removed? Bjrobinson 14:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm going to remove this then. Feel free to put back, if there is a specific reason it should be there. Bjrobinson 14:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Line diagram
I've added a basic diagram, feel free to add any additions, such as freight sidings at St Andrews Road or better layout of junctions
I don't know who made the above remark or when (please use the signature button) but I've just done a fairly major overhaul of both the article content (for the new enhanced timetable) and the line diagram. It might be a bit over the top now, I got slightly carried away! --Peeky44 (talk) 16:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Might it be worth using this method for things like minor road bridges (eg Whiteladies Rd and anything smaller)? The diagram is,as I hinted above, a bit huge for such a short line! --Peeky44 (talk) 07:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I added the diagram ages ago, Peeky44. Other short lines don't have the name for every road they cross, I think rivers & Motorways are OK and maybe A Roads, but I think the others are rather large! Mojo (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Class rating
I reckon with the recent improvements to this article, it's due for an upgrade to B-class. However, as I made many of these changes, perhaps that's not a Neutral Point of View, so I won't change it myself, at least not now. I'm also nominating it for Good Article status as I think it might well be up to that as well. Obviously if the GA status is approved by the appropriate reviewer(s) then B-class is no longer an issue... Any comments? --Peeky44 (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Easily 'B' class, so I made that change. I'll leave the more regular GA people to look into that, as I'm not sufficiently separated from Bristol to do the job properly, but I think at the least, it is better than your average 'B' class article. Splash - tk 12:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
