Talk:Sandgate District State High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within Schools. Please rate the article. | |
 |
Sandgate District State High School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Brisbane. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
I wonder why you keep editing out my completely legitimate posts and instead of posting entirely ridiculous acronyms (non-NPOV- could u please exaplain what that means) post some real information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extra person of school (talk • contribs) 09:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- EPoS, I need to know on what authority you're making these claims. "Non-NPOV" means 'non-neutral point of view' - for example, if you're posting a personal opinion, that's non-neutral point of view, and I'm afraid it's not Wikilegal. ThirdEchelon (talk) 11:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- ok well perhaps its a personal point of view. but the basic ideas behind what i ahve said sofar that u have edited out are true.
1) the school was on channel nine news last year for being involved in people posting videos of fights on youtube 2) the school has been in serious trouble with the department of education over recent changes in school policy regarding uniform policy where they decided to send students home for incorrect uniform(direct violation of EDUCATION (GENERAL PROVISIONS) ACT 2006 - SECT 362 (violation of dress code) and a biometric system which was deemed by the department of education to be inappropriate and they were forced to not allow it to go ahead (if u were at sandgate last yr u'd remember them talking about it) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extra person of school (talk • contribs) 08:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- I was indeed at Sandgate last year. However, you still need to be citing sources. ThirdEchelon (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
-
I wonder if Sandgate would mind if we included some more of their history on the article. ThirdEchelon 04:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Note to all users editing this page: Any prejudicial non-NPOV will be removed within a day. ThirdEchelon 23:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
