Talk:New Lanark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to WikiProject Urban studies and planning, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments) | |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance within the UK geography WikiProject. | |
[edit] Vandalism
Adding new information and enhancing a site is not vandalism. Remember articles are not private property & you cannot just revert back to remove valuable contributions. Tut Tut. Rosser 12:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Rosser - welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits because you had deleted large sections of the article without giving your reasons or discussing any proposed deletions on this page. If you want to remove large sections of an article then discuss the edits here first. As you say, articles are not private property. That applies to you as well. Mrslippery 15:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- From what I can see Rosser made absolutely no deletions during his editing of this article, instead merely adding a few details which were then reverted by Mrslippery for no good reason whatsoever. I think people need to get their facts straight before they start accusing people of vandalism. Rosser has been a Wikipedia member for many months with many worthwhile contributions. --Dreamer84 23:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
That is certainly my understanding of my actions. Rosser 23:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
The content had definitely gone, but perhaps the page did not load correctly, or someone else had made the deletion. My apologies if I got it wrong. Mrslippery (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
