Talk:NASCAR Sprint All-Star Race
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Carolina, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve North Carolina-related articles to a feature-quality standard. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. To view recent changes to the project's articles, please check out the related changes page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. |
 |
This page has been cited as a source by a media organization. The citation is in:
|
Contents |
[edit] NEXTEL Open?
Do you guys think that the NEXTEL Open is enough of its own entity to warrant a seperate article? I'm kind of on the fence and would like to know what other people think. Recury 13:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think so myself. I think that it can be propertly entertwined into this article. Over at the Budweiser Shootout page, I was able to easily merge the Bud Shootout Qualifier information. Doctorindy 16:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, on second thought, maybe we should do it, I'm finding a lot of info that could really bulk it up. I'll get back to that decision after I do a little more research. Doctorindy 16:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Well, a year later I'm finally getting to some of the holes in this page. The information is becoming more and more easy to access, so it should be filled in real soon. I'm going to try and fins some information on the minor events too. Doctorindy 15:36, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- CORRECTIONS & CLARIFICATIONS
- After research, there ends up there were 2 sprint races. The "No Bull 25" was a qualifying race for the Winston Open from 98-00. From 2000-2002, the No Bull Sprint was a last-chance race for the Winston. Two new boxes were added for the race results of those two. Although there are a few small holes here and there, all the winners are accounted for. Research ongoing.Doctorindy 18:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No Bull Sprint
This is written: In 2000, after The Winston Open, a 16-lap "No Bull Sprint" was added to after The Winston Open. The winner of this race would also advance to The Winston.
I don't think that is entirely accurate, at least partially. The No Bull Sprint was used in at 1998 as a 25-lap qualifying race for the Winston Open. They used to have normal one-lap qualifying for the Winston Open, but that I guess got boring, so they had twin 25-lap race on Friday night. In 1998, winners were Jeremy Mayfield and Jimmy Spencer. More research is needed, and is on-going. Doctorindy 16:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Other information
http://sports.yahoo.com/nascar/nextel/schedule?year=2004
Winston Open Poles
- 2002 Open Jeremy Mayfield 183.336
- 2003 Steve Park 184.244
- 2004 Dave Blaney 185.058
- 2005 Mike Bliss 189.208
- 2006 Scott Riggs 186.509
- 2007 Carl Edwards 187.487
Doctorindy 18:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
The Winston Poles
- 1998 Winston Bill Elliott 142.084
Doctorindy 18:55, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NextelChallenge.JPEG
Image:NextelChallenge.JPEG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
