User talk:Mtlcrue
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Mtlcrue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Sherool (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Liman 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Liman 2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Sherool (talk) 17:37, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Slike
Pozdrav komšija, sviđaju mi se slike Novog Sada koje si ubacio, međutim, da li bi mogao da kod tih slika napišeš koji je njihov copyright status, jer slike bez definisanog copyright statusa obično budu obrisane. PANONIAN (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Panorama_3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Panorama_3.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 06:32, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Rumenacka_Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rumenacka_Street.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Catholic Church 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Catholic Church 1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ×Meegs 03:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Novi Sad
The population figure for Novi Sad given on www.gradnovisad.org.yu is WRONG. Only relevant population data is that from 2002 census. Census data is ONLY OFFICIAL DATA and MOST CORRECT DATA. All other population figures are nothing else but randomness estimations which should not be used here if we already have official data from census. Here is the official publication of the Serbian government with official census data:
Please read that document. Second thing, why you wrote that Veternik and Futog are part of urban Novi Sad when they ARE NOT? Only Novi Sad, Petrovaradin, and Sremska Kamenica are part of urban Novi Sad, while Futog and Veternik are SUBURBAN SETTLEMENTS! PANONIAN (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Pa ne znam ni ja kako zvanični sajt Novog Sada može da ima pogrešne podatke, to moraš pitati onoga ko je taj sajt pravio. Ko zna odakle je on uzeo te podatke, ali to sigurno nisu zvanični podaci sa popisa, koji se smatraju najtačnijim u ovom slučaju. Sledeće, što se tiče rečenice "The settlements with recognized town/city status", pre svega, tu rečenicu sam ja tamo napisao, a radi se o tome da neka naselja imaju status grada ili gradskog naselja a ne da su deo nekog drugog grada. Dakle, misli se na to da su Novi Sad, Petrovaradin, Sremska Kamenica i Futog gradovi, a ne deo grada. Dakle, radi se o četiri grada, odnosno naselja sa gradskim statusom. Da bi jedno naseljeno mesto bilo priznato kao grad mora da ima određene institucije kao što su srednja škola, bolnica, pošta, itd... Dakle kao što rekoh, radi se o četiri naselja kojima je priznat status gradova, s tim što su tri od njih (Novi Sad, Petrovaradin i Sremska Kamenica) takođe deo onog što se smatra urbanim Novim Sadom. O tome se radi. Futog i Veternik će verovatno postati deo urbanog Novog Sada (to se planira), ali trenutno još uvek nisu. Veternik ima status prigradskog naselja, a Futog status posebnog grada. A što se tiče slika, ne znam ni ja koji copyright da staviš, i mene su dosta cimali zbog toga, evo sad mi je čak jedan lik i pretio da će mi zabraniti da editujem na Vikipediji zbog neke slike na koju sam stavio pogrešan copyright još u oktobru prošle godine. Zato sam lepo uzeo fotoaparat i sam uradio slike i stavio im "PD-self" copyright (to staviš kad si ti autor). Za drugo ne znam. PANONIAN (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
