Talk:Minuteman Bikeway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cycling Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling. WikiProject Cycling is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] Better map needed

The image used here is pretty useless. I've ridden the bikeway before and could not actually find it. Flamesplash 04:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Would tracing an existing map (using, say Inkscape) and submitting it be allowable under the licensing terms of Wikipedia? Or would that be considered a derivative work and thus a copyright infringement? Is there any formal way to secure a license for an existing map that is compatible with the GFDL? audiodude 15:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The true distance

One of the most basic facts about the Bikeway--its length--is often stated erroneously. Published misinformation on the distance from the terminus at Alewife to the other terminus in Bedford, giving 11 miles as the distance, dates from the Bikeway's inception, and has been quoted ever since. Unfortunately, the false distance information persists, even appearing on the "Official Website", and has found its way into guidebooks and newspaper articles. It is also misleading that the granite mileposts along the path were misinscribed and remain so (instead of going from zero to ten miles, the markings on one side of the posts start at one and end at eleven). However, anyone with a reasonably accurate cycle odometer, or even a decent map and a map measurer, can verify that the distance is 10 miles. Indeed, there are ten one-mile stretches between mileposts. Ten miles is the true distance. Hertz1888 02:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I've never travelled the path myself, but I would say that your conclusion falls under the category of 'original research' which, as I understand, is not allowed on Wikipedia. It is unfortunate that the official site and newspaper articles quote 11 miles, but unless you can find a source that backs up your finding that it is actually 10, I think it is appropriate for the encyclopedia article to state the widely accepted value. But I am by no means an expert! audiodude 02:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Various reliable sources don't seem to agree with each other on this piece of information. For example, here and here they say that the length is 10.5 miles. Maybe the numbers 10 and 11 are just two acceptable options to round this number to an integer :). (But Hertz still seems to claim that it's 10 rather than 10.5, and I don't know why we shouldn't trust him.) Yevgeny Kats 03:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Physical facts that are readily verifiable are not a matter of majority vote or acceptance-except maybe on Wiki. There's nothing esoteric or opinion-based involved here. The facts "on the ground" are there for all to see. Go see, or examine a map. (Surely you don't believe everything you read in the newspapers). I've given at least three methods whereby any observer can verify the distance. A trip to the Bedford terminus will immediately show that the mile markers start from "1", adding a non-existent mile. It's not just me saying this: see edit summary in page history for Nov. 2, 2005. I will contact the path custodians and try to get the figure corrected on the official site. In the meantime, I hope there is enough information given here for all readers to make a proper informed judgment, without our reverting the page to the false figure. There's been enough confusion already. Hertz1888 03:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

With the understanding that any "original research" of mine has no authoritative value on Wiki, perhaps I can at least provide some reassurance and background information. My measurements were made with good maps and a calibrated map measuring instrument, and with Google Earth, equivalent to both. They showed that the individual mileposts were set up with excellent accuracy, and the overall distance (from the Bedford terminus to the Arlington-Cambridge line) is 10 miles to within a few hundredths of a mile; that's the extent of the rounding. Not 10.5 and not 11. The markings on the mileposts, as I have said, are misleading and could have given rise to the confusion in the first place. I encourage anyone with the means to check the distance to go do so, though those results, unless published, won't bear any weight here either for citation purposes. Hertz1888 04:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Right, my measurement on Google Earth also gives 10 miles to within a few hundredths of a mile. Yevgeny Kats

I have found other sources that list the distance as 10 miles: