Talk:Mike Flores

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

There is obvious some vandalism going on in Mike's biography. Some of the details that have been added in lately have clearly been added to harm Mike's reputation and promote other people.

MattWang 04:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you consider the section on Mike's "grandiose vocabulary" vandalism when you leave the section about the "bad player Flores" nickname. I don't know too much about the critic, but I added the link only as a reference to the particular articles mentioned. And the deletions I reverted seemed to be vandalism to me given their edit summaries were more offensive (towards Spaniel) than defensive (of Flores). --Insane 22:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Response to Insane

No offense intended towards you. "Bad Player Flores" is a nickname that he has earned, but now with his recent successes has shaken off. I removed the specific reference to the column that critized him, because it felt that it was purposely trying to promote that column. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MattWang (talk • contribs) 14:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC).