IPv4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The five-layer TCP/IP model
5. Application layer
DHCP · DNS · FTP · Gopher · HTTP · IMAP4 · IRC · NNTP · XMPP · POP3 · RTP · SIP · SMTP · SNMP · SSH · TELNET · RPC · RTCP · RTSP · TLS (and SSL) · SDP · SOAP · GTP · STUN · NTP · (more)
4. Transport layer
TCP · UDP · DCCP · SCTP · RSVP · ECN · (more)
3. Network/internet layer
IP (IPv4 · IPv6) · OSPF · IS-IS · BGP · IPsec · ARP · RARP · RIP · ICMP · ICMPv6 · IGMP · (more)
2. Data link layer
802.11 (WLAN) · 802.16 · Wi-Fi · WiMAX · ATM · DTM · Token ring · Ethernet · FDDI · Frame Relay · GPRS · EVDO · HSPA · HDLC · PPP · PPTP · L2TP · ISDN · ARCnet · LLTD · (more)
1. Physical layer
Ethernet physical layer · RS-232 · SONET/SDH · G.709 · Optical fiber · Coaxial cable · Twisted pair · (more)
This box: view • talk • edit

Internet Protocol version 4 (IPv4) is the fourth iteration of the Internet Protocol (IP) and it is the first version of the protocol to be widely deployed. IPv4 is the dominant network layer protocol on the Internet and apart from IPv6 it is the only standard internetwork-layer protocol used on the Internet.

It is described in IETF RFC 791 (September 1981) which made obsolete RFC 760 (January 1980). The United States Department of Defense also standardized it as MIL-STD-1777.

IPv4 is a data-oriented protocol to be used on a packet switched internetwork (e.g., Ethernet). It is a best effort protocol in that it does not guarantee delivery. It does not make any guarantees on the correctness of the data; this may result in duplicated packets or packets delivered out of order. These aspects are addressed by an upper layer protocol (e.g. TCP, and partly by UDP).

[edit] Addressing

Internet addressing growth map.

IPv4 uses 32-bit (four-byte) addresses, which limits the address space to 4,294,967,296 (2³²) possible unique addresses. However, some are reserved for special purposes such as private networks (~18 million addresses) or multicast addresses (~16 million addresses). This reduces the number of addresses that can be allocated as public Internet addresses. As the number of addresses available are consumed, an IPv4 address shortage appears to be inevitable, however Network Address Translation (NAT) has significantly delayed this inevitability.

This limitation has helped stimulate the push towards IPv6, which is currently in the early stages of deployment and is currently the only contender to replace IPv4.

[edit] Address representations

When writing IPv4 addresses in human-readable form, the most common notation is the dot-decimal notation. There are other notations based on the values of 200.100 in the dot-decimal notation which comprises four octets in decimal separated by periods. This is the base format used in the conversion in the following table:

Notation	Value	Conversion from dot-decimal
Dot-decimal notation	`192.0.2.235`	N/A
Dotted Hexadecimal	`0xC0.0x00.0x02.0xEB`	Each octet is individually converted to hex
Dotted Octal	`0300.0000.0002.0353`	Each octet is individually converted into octal
Hexadecimal	`0xC00002EB`	Concatenation of the octets from the dotted hexadecimal
Decimal	`3221226219`	The hexadecimal form converted to decimal
Octal	`030000001353`	The hexadecimal form converted to octal

Most of these formats should work in all browsers. Additionally, in dotted format, each octet can be of any of the different bases. For example, 192.0x00.0002.235 is a valid (though unconventional) equivalent to the above addresses.

A final form is not really a notation since it is rarely written in an ASCII string notation. That form is a binary form of the hexadecimal notation in binary. This difference is merely the representational difference between the string "0xCF8E83EB" and the 32-bit integer value 0xCF8E83EB. This form is used for assigning the source and destination fields in a software program.

[edit] Allocation

Originally, an IP address was divided into two parts:

Network ID: first octet
Host ID: last three octets

This created an upper limit of 256 networks. As the networks began to be allocated, this was soon seen to be inadequate.

To overcome this limit, different classes of network were defined, in a system which later became known as classful networking. Five classes were created (A, B, C, D, and E), three of which (A, B, and C) had different lengths for the network field. The rest of an address was used to identify a host within a network, which meant that each network class had a different maximum number of hosts. Thus there were a few networks with each having many host addresses and numerous networks with each only having a few host addresses. Class D was for multicast addresses and Class E was reserved.

Around 1993, these classes were replaced with a Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) scheme, and the previous scheme was dubbed "classful", by contrast. CIDR's primary advantage is to allow re-division of Class-A, -B and -C networks so that smaller (or larger) blocks of addresses may be allocated to various entities (such as Internet service providers, or their customers) or local area networks.

The actual assignment of an address is not arbitrary. The fundamental principle of routing is that the address of a device encodes information about the device's location within a network. This implies that an address assigned to one part of a network will not function in another part of the network. A hierarchical structure, created by CIDR and overseen by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) and its Regional Internet Registries (RIRs), manages the assignment of Internet addresses worldwide. Each RIR maintains a publicly-searchable WHOIS database that provides information about IP address assignments; information from these databases plays a central role in numerous tools that attempt to locate IP addresses geographically.

Reserved address blocks
CIDR address block	Description	Reference
0.0.0.0/8	Current network (only valid as source address)	RFC 1700
10.0.0.0/8	Private network	RFC 1918
14.0.0.0/8	Public data networks (per 2008-02-10, available for use^[1])	RFC 1700
127.0.0.0/8	Loopback	RFC 3330
128.0.0.0/16	Reserved (IANA)	RFC 3330
169.254.0.0/16	Link-Local	RFC 3927
172.16.0.0/12	Private network	RFC 1918
191.255.0.0/16	Reserved (IANA)	RFC 3330
192.0.0.0/24	Reserved (IANA)	RFC 3330
192.0.2.0/24	Documentation and example code	RFC 3330
192.88.99.0/24	IPv6 to IPv4 relay	RFC 3068
192.168.0.0/16	Private network	RFC 1918
198.18.0.0/15	Network benchmark tests	RFC 2544
223.255.255.0/24	Reserved (IANA)	RFC 3330
224.0.0.0/4	Multicasts (former Class D network)	RFC 3171
240.0.0.0/4	Reserved (former Class E network)	RFC 1700
255.255.255.255	Broadcast

[edit] Private networks

Main article: private network

Of the four billion addresses allowed in IPv4, four ranges of address are reserved for private networking use only. These ranges are not routable outside of private networks, and private machines cannot directly communicate with public networks. They can, however, do so through network address translation.

The following are the four ranges reserved for private networks:

Name	Address range	Number of addresses	Classful description	Largest CIDR block
24-bit block	10.0.0.0–10.255.255.255	16,777,216	Single Class A	10.0.0.0/8
20-bit block	172.16.0.0–172.31.255.255	1,048,576	16 contiguous Class Bs	172.16.0.0/12
16-bit block	169.254.0.0–169.254.255.255	65,536	256 contiguous Class Cs	169.254.0.0/16
16-bit block	192.168.0.0–192.168.255.255	65,536	256 contiguous Class Cs	192.168.0.0/16

The ranges 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16 are reserved for private networking by RFC 1918, while the 169.254.0.0/16 range is reserved for Link-Local addressing as defined in RFC 3927.

[edit] Localhost

Main article: localhost

In addition to private networking, the address range 127.0.0.0–127.255.255.255 (or 127.0.0.0/8 in CIDR notation) is reserved for localhost communication. Any address within this range should never appear on an actual network and any packet sent to this address does not leave the source computer, and will appear as an incoming packet on that computer (known as loopback).

[edit] Addresses ending in 0 or 255

Main article: IPv4 subnetting reference

It is a common misconception that addresses ending in 255 or 0 can never be assigned to hosts, but this is only true of networks with subnet masks of at least 24 bits — Class C networks in the old classful addressing scheme, or in CIDR, networks with masks of /24 to /32 (or 255.255.255.0–255.255.255.255).

In classful addressing (now obsolete with the advent of CIDR), there are only three possible subnet masks: Class A, 255.0.0.0 or /8; Class B, 255.255.0.0 or /16; and Class C, 255.255.255.0 or /24. For example, in the subnet 192.168.5.0/255.255.255.0 (or 192.168.5.0/24) the identifier 192.168.5.0 refers to the entire subnet, so it cannot also refer to an individual device in that subnet.

A broadcast address is an address that allows information to be sent to all machines on a given subnet rather than a specific machine. Generally, the broadcast address is found by taking the bit complement of the subnet mask and then OR-ing it bitwise with the network identifier. More simply, the broadcast address is the last address in the range belonging to the subnet. In our example, the broadcast address would be 192.168.5.255, so to avoid confusion this address also cannot be assigned to a host. On a Class-A, -B, or -C subnet, the broadcast address would always end in 255.

However, this does not mean that every addresses ending in 255 cannot be used as a host address. For example, in the case of a Class B subnet 192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0 (or 192.168.0.0/16), equivalent to the address range 192.168.0.0–192.168.255.255, the broadcast address is 192.168.255.255. However, one can assign 192.168.1.255, 192.168.2.255, etc. (though this can cause confusion). Also, 192.168.0.0 is the network identifier and so cannot be assigned, but 192.168.1.0, 192.168.2.0, etc. can be assigned (though this can also cause confusion).

With the advent of CIDR, broadcast addresses do not necessarily end with 255.

In general, the first and last addresses in a subnet are used as the network identifier and broadcast address, respectively. All other addresses in the subnet can be assigned to hosts on that subnet.

[edit] Resolving

Main article: Domain Name System

Hosts on the Internet are usually known not by IP addresses but by names (e.g., www.wikipedia.org, www.whitehouse.gov, www.freebsd.org, www.berkeley.edu). The routing of IP packets across the Internet is not connected to such names. This requires translating (or resolving) names to addresses.

The Domain Name System (DNS) provides such a system to convert names to addresses and addresses to names. Much like CIDR addressing, the DNS naming is also hierarchical and allows for subdelegation of name spaces to other DNS servers.

Think of this in a similar way to how you find a phone number. You want to call The Acme Bakers but don't know the number. You ring directory enquiries and they tell you the number you need to dial or can even connect you. Next you might want to call Acme Builder. Again, you only need to know the phone number of directory enquiries, they will almost always have the number you want and connect you. Only if you ask directory enquiries for the number of a company which doesn't exist will they say they can't connect you - similar to a DNS error in your web browser.

[edit] Exhaustion

Main article: IP address exhaustion

Since the 1980s, there has been concern that the number of available IP(v4) addresses is being exhausted. This was the driving factor in classful networks and then later in the creation of CIDR addressing.

Today, there are several driving forces to the next address allocation solution:

Mobile devices — laptop computers, PDAs, mobile phones
Always-on devices — ADSL modems, cable modems
Rapidly growing number of Internet users

The most visible solution is to migrate to IPv6 since the address size jumps dramatically from 32 bits to 128 bits, which would allow each of about 18 quintillion people their own set of 18 quintillion addresses (3.4e38 total addresses). However, migration has proved to be a challenge in itself, and total Internet adoption of IPv6 is unlikely to occur for many years.

Some things that can be done to mitigate the IPv4 address exhaustion are (not mutually exclusive):

Network address translation (NAT)
Use of private networks
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
Name-based virtual hosting
Tighter control by Regional Internet Registries on the allocation of addresses to Local Internet Registries
Network renumbering to reclaim large blocks of address space allocated in the early days of the Internet

As of April 2008, predictions of exhaustion date of the unallocated IANA pool seem to converge to between February 2010.^[2] and May 2011^[3]

[edit] Network address translation

Main article: Network address translation

One method to increase both address utilization and security is to use network address translation (NAT). With NAT, assigning one address to a public machine as an internet gateway and using a private network for an organization's computers allows for considerable address savings. This also increases security by making the computers on a private network not directly accessible from the public network.

[edit] Virtual private networks

Main article: Virtual private network

Since private address ranges are deliberately ignored by all public routers, it is not normally possible to connect two private networks (e.g., two branch offices) via the public Internet. Virtual private networks (VPNs) solve this problem.

VPNs work by inserting an IP packet (encapsulated packet) directly into the data field of another IP packet (encapsulating packet) and using a publicly routable address in the encapsulating packet. Once the VPN packet is routed across the public network and reaches the endpoint, the encapsulated packet is extracted and then transmitted on the private network just as if the two private networks were directly connected.

Optionally, the encapsulated packet can be encrypted to secure the data while over the public network (see VPN article for more details).

[edit] Address Resolution Protocol

Main article: Address Resolution Protocol

IP is a protocol associated with the network layer and deals heavily with logical addressing schemes (i.e., IP addresses). If node A on network 1 sends a packet (which includes the source and destination IP) of information across a segmented network to node B on network 2, the interconnecting network device(s) — such as a switch, which has addressing tables that are dynamically populated — must be able to resolve a node's physical MAC address to its logical IP address in order for it to forward that packet to the destination IP address. This discovery and mapping of IP addresses to hardware (MAC) addresses is accomplished through Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages, which are always executed as a network layer broadcast. Once the mapping has been made, it is stored in the switch's addressing/routing table for a specified amount of time, otherwise known as TTL, for future use.

[edit] Reverse Address Resolution Protocol/DHCP

Main articles: Reverse Address Resolution Protocol, BOOTP, and Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol

Unlike the situation outlined for ARP, the case arises when a computer knows its data link layer address but not its IP address. This is a common scenario in private networks and Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) connections when the IP addresses of the machines are irrelevant. This is usually the case for work stations but not servers.

RARP is an obsoleted method for answering this question: “This is my hardware address; what is my IP address?” RARP was replaced by BOOTP which, in turn, was replaced by Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP).

In addition to assigning an IP address, DHCP can also assign an NTP server, DNS servers, and more.

[edit] Packet structure

An IP packet consists of a header section and a data section.

[edit] Header

The header consists of 13 fields, of which only 12 are required. The 13^th field is optional (red background in table) and aptly named: options. The fields in the header are packed with the most significant byte first (big endian), and for the diagram and discussion, the most significant bits are considered to come first. The most significant bit is numbered 0, so the version field is actually found in the four most significant bits of the first byte, for example.

+	Bits 0–3	4–7	8–15	16–18	19–31
0	Version	Header length	Type of Service (now DiffServ and ECN)	Total Length
32	Identification			Flags	Fragment Offset
64	Time to Live		Protocol	Header Checksum
96	Source Address
128	Destination Address
160	Options
160 or 192+	Data

Version

The first header field in an IP packet is the four-bit version field. For IPv4, this has a value of 4 (hence the name IPv4).

Internet Header Length (IHL)

The second field is a four-bit Internet Header Length (IHL) telling the number of 32-bit words in the header. Since an IPv4 header may contain a variable number of options, this field specifies the size of the header (this also coincides with the offset to the data). The minimum value for this field is 5 (rfc791), which is a length of 5×32 = 160 bits. Being a four-bit field, the maximum length is 15 words or 480 bits.

Type of Service (TOS)

In RFC 791, the following eight bits were allocated to a Type of Service (TOS) field:

bits 0–2: precedence (111 - Network Control, 110 - Internetwork Control, 101 - CRITIC/ECP, 100 - Flash Override, 011 - Flash, 010 - Immediate, 001 - Priority, 000 - Routine)
bit 3: 0 = Normal Delay, 1 = Low Delay
bit 4: 0 = Normal Throughput, 1 = High Throughput
bit 5: 0 = Normal Reliability, 1 = High Reliability
bits 6–7: Reserved for future use

This field is now used for DiffServ and ECN. The original intention was for a sending host to specify a preference for how the datagram would be handled as it made its way through an internet. For instance, one host could set its IPv4 datagrams' TOS field value to prefer low delay, while another might prefer high reliability. In practice, the TOS field has not been widely implemented. However, a great deal of experimental, research and deployment work has focused on how to make use of these eight bits. These bits have been redefined, most recently through DiffServ working group in the IETF and the Explicit Congestion Notification codepoints (see RFC 3168). New technologies are emerging that require real-time data streaming and therefore will make use of the TOS field. An example is Voice over IP (VoIP) that is used for interactive data voice exchange.

Total Length

This 16-bit field defines the entire datagram size, including header and data, in bytes. The minimum-length datagram is 20 bytes (20-byte header + 0 bytes data) and the maximum is 65,535 — the maximum value of a 16-bit word. The minimum size datagram that any host is required to be able to handle is 576 bytes, but most modern hosts handle much larger packets. Sometimes subnetworks impose further restrictions on the size, in which case datagrams must be fragmented. Fragmentation is handled in either the host or packet switch in IPv4 (see Fragmentation and reassembly).

Identification

This field is an identification field and is primarily used for uniquely identifying fragments of an original IP datagram. Some experimental work has suggested using the ID field for other purposes, such as for adding packet-tracing information to datagrams in order to help trace back datagrams with spoofed source addresses.

Flags

A three-bit field follows and is used to control or identify fragments. They are (in order, from high order to low order):

Reserved; must be zero. As an April Fools joke, proposed for use in RFC 3514 as the "Evil bit".
Don't Fragment (DF)
More Fragments (MF)

If the DF flag is set and fragmentation is required to route the packet then the packet will be dropped. This can be used when sending packets to a host that does not have sufficient resources to handle fragmentation.

When a packet is fragmented all fragments have the MF flag set except the last fragment, which does not have the MF flag set. The MF flag is also not set on packets that are not fragmented — an unfragmented packet is its own last fragment.

Fragment Offset

The fragment offset field, measured in units of eight-byte blocks, is 13 bits long and specifies the offset of a particular fragment relative to the beginning of the original unfragmented IP datagram. The first fragment has an offset of zero. This allows a maximum offset of 65,528 ( $(2^{13}-1)\times8$ ) which would exceed the maximum IP packet length of 65,535 with the header length included.

Time To Live (TTL)

An eight-bit time to live (TTL) field helps prevent datagrams from persisting (e.g. going in circles) on an internet. Historically the TTL field limited a datagram's lifetime in seconds, but has come to be a hop count field. Each packet switch (or router) that a datagram crosses decrements the TTL field by one. When the TTL field hits zero, the packet is no longer forwarded by a packet switch and is discarded. Typically, an ICMP message (specifically the time exceeded) is sent back to the sender that it has been discarded. The reception of these ICMP messages is at the heart of how traceroute works.

Protocol

This field defines the protocol used in the data portion of the IP datagram. The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority maintains a list of Protocol numbers and were originally defined in RFC 790. Common protocols and their decimal values are shown below (see Data).

Header Checksum

The 16-bit checksum field is used for error-checking of the header. At each hop, the checksum of the header must be compared to the value of this field. If a header checksum is found to be mismatched, then the packet is discarded. Note that errors in the data field are up to the encapsulated protocol to handle — indeed, both UDP and TCP have checksum fields.

Since the TTL field is decremented on each hop and fragmentation is possible at each hop then at each hop the checksum will have to be recomputed. The method used to compute the checksum is defined within RFC 791:

The checksum field is the 16-bit one's complement of the one's complement sum of all 16-bit words in the header. For purposes of computing the checksum, the value of the checksum field is zero.

In other words, all 16-bit words are summed together using one's complement (with the checksum field set to zero). The sum is then one's complemented and this final value is inserted as the checksum field.

Source address

An IPv4 address is a group of four eight-bit octets for a total of 32 bits. The value for this field is determined by taking the binary value of each octet and concatenating them together to make a single 32-bit value.

For example, the address 10.9.8.7 (00001010.00001001.00001000.00000111 in binary) would be 00001010000010010000100000000111.

This address is the address of the sender of the packet. Note that this address may not be the "true" sender of the packet due to network address translation. Instead, the source address will be translated by the NATing machine to its own address. Thus, reply packets sent by the receiver are routed to the NATing machine, which translates the destination address to the original sender's address.

Destination address

Identical to the source address field but indicates the receiver of the packet.

Options

Additional header fields may follow the destination address field, but these are not often used. Note that the value in the IHL field must include enough extra 32-bit words to hold all the options (plus any padding needed to ensure that the header contains an integral number of 32-bit words). The list of options may be terminated with an EOL (End of Options List, 0x00) option; this is only necessary if the end of the options would not otherwise coincide with the end of the header. The possible options that can be put in the header are as follows:

Field	Size (bits)	Description
Copied	1	Set to 1 if the options need to be copied into all fragments of a fragmented packet.
Option Class	2	A general options category. 0 is for "control" options, and 2 is for "debugging and measurement". 1, and 3 are reserved.
Option Number	5	Specifies an option.
Option Length	8	Indicates the size of the entire option (including this field). This field may not exist for simple options.
Option Data	Variable	Option-specific data. This field may not exist for simple options.

Note: the Copied, Option Class, and Option Number are sometimes referred to as a single eight-bit field - the Option Type.

The use of the LSRR and SSRR options (Loose and Strict Source and Record Route) is discouraged because they create security concerns; many routers block packets containing these options.

[edit] Data

The last field is not a part of the header and, consequently, not included in the checksum field. The contents of the data field are specified in the protocol header field and can be any one of the transport layer protocols.

Some of the most commonly used protocols are listed below including their value used in the protocol field:

1: Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP)
2: Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP)
6: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
17: User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
89: Open Shortest Path First (OSPF)
132: Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)

See List of IPv4 protocol numbers for a complete list.

[edit] Fragmentation and reassembly

Main article: IP fragmentation

To make IPv4 more tolerant of different networks the concept of fragmentation was added so that, if necessary, a device could break up the data into smaller pieces. This is necessary when the maximum transmission unit (MTU) is smaller than the packet size.

For example, the maximum size of an IP packet is 65,535 bytes while the typical MTU for Ethernet is 1,500 bytes. Since the IP header consumes 20 bytes (without options) of the 1,500 bytes leaving 1,480 bytes of IP data per Ethernet frame (this leads to an MTU for IP of 1,480 bytes). Therefore, a 65,535-byte data payload would require 45 packets (65535/1480 = 44.28).

The reason fragmentation was chosen to occur at the IP layer is that IP is the first layer that connects hosts instead of machines. If fragmentation were performed on higher layers (TCP, UDP, etc.) then this would make fragmentation/reassembly redundantly implemented (once per protocol); if fragmentation were performed on a lower layer (Ethernet, ATM, etc.) then this would require fragmentation/reassembly to be performed on each hop (could be quite costly) and redundantly implemented (once per link layer protocol). Therefore, the IP layer is the most efficient one for fragmentation.

[edit] Fragmentation

When a device receives an IP packet it examines the destination address and determines the outgoing interface to use. This interface has an associated MTU that dictates the maximum data size for its payload. If the MTU is smaller than the data size then the device must fragment the data.

The device then segments the data into segments where each segment is less-than-or-equal-to the MTU less the IP header size (20 bytes minimum; 60 bytes maximum). Each segment is then put into its own IP packet with the following changes:

The total length field will be adjusted to the segment size
The more fragments (MF) flag is set for all segments except the last one, that would be set to 0
The fragment offset field is set accordingly based on the offset of the segment in the original data payload. This is measured in units of eight-byte blocks.

For example, for an IP header of length 20 bytes and an Ethernet MTU of 1,500 bytes the fragment offsets would be: 0, (1480/8) = 185, (2960/8) = 370, (4440/8) = 555, (5920/8) = 740, etc.

By some chance if a packet changes link layer protocols or the MTU reduces then these fragments would be fragmented again.

For example, if a 4,500-byte data payload is inserted into an IP packet with no options (thus total length is 4,520 bytes) and is transmitted over a link with an MTU of 2,500 bytes then it will be broken up into two fragments:

#	Total length		More fragments (MF) flag set?	Fragment offset
#	Header	Data	More fragments (MF) flag set?	Fragment offset
1	2500		Yes	0
1	20	2480	Yes	0
2	2040		No	310
2	20	2020	No	310

Now, let's say the MTU drops to 1,500 bytes. Each fragment will individually be split up into two more fragments each:

#	Total length		More fragments (MF) flag set?	Fragment offset
#	Header	Data	More fragments (MF) flag set?	Fragment offset
1	1500		Yes	0
1	20	1480	Yes	0
2	1020		Yes	185
2	20	1000	Yes	185
3	1500		Yes	310
3	20	1480	Yes	310
4	560		No	495
4	20	540	No	495

Indeed, the amount of data has been preserved — 1480 + 1000 + 1480 + 540 = 4500 — and the last fragment offset plus data — 3960 + 540 = 4500 — is also the total length.

Note that fragments 3 & 4 were derived from the original fragment 2. When a device must fragment the last fragment then it must set the flag for all but the last fragment it creates (fragment 4 in this case). Last fragment would be set to 0 value.

[edit] Reassembly

When a receiver detects an IP packet where either of the following is true:

"more fragments" flag set
"fragment offset" field is non-zero

then the receiver knows the packet is a fragment. The receiver then stores the data with the identification field, fragment offset, and the more fragments flag. When the receiver receives a fragment with the more fragments flag set to 0 then it knows the length of the original data payload since the fragment offset plus the data length is equivalent to the original data payload size.

Using the example above, when the receiver receives fragment 4 the fragment offset (495 or 3960 bytes) and the data length (540 bytes) added together yield 4500 — the original data length.

Once it has all the fragments then it can reassemble the data in proper order (by using the fragment offsets) and pass it up the stack for further processing.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

^ ICANN Recovers Large Block of Internet Address Space
^ Hain, Tony. IPv4 Address Pool, quarterly generated. Retrieved on 2007-07-01.
^ Huston, Geoff. IPv4 Address Report, daily generated. Retrieved on 2007-09-30.

[edit] External links

RFC 791 — Internet Protocol
http://www.iana.org — Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/ip.htm — IP Header Breakdown, including specific options
RFC 3344 — IPv4 Mobility

Address exhaustion

Categories: Internet Protocol | Network layer protocols

See also ebooksgratis.com: no banners, no cookies, totally FREE.