History of the British canal system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2007)

The British canal system of water transport played a vital role in Britain's Industrial Revolution at a time when roads were only just emerging from the medieval mud and long trains of pack horses were the only means of "mass" transit by road of raw materials and finished products (it was no accident that amongst the first canal promoters were the pottery manufacturers of Staffordshire). Britain was the first country to acquire a nationwide canal network.^[1]

Contents 1 Overview 1.1 19th century 1.2 20th century 2 Early history 2.1 Middle Ages 2.2 Post-medieval transport systems 3 The Industrial Revolution 3.1 The Sankey Brook Navigation 3.2 The Bridgewater Canal 3.3 Horse drawn canal transport 3.4 The Golden Age 4 Standard locks 5 Geography 5.1 The Midlands and the North of England 5.2 London 5.3 Wales and South West England 5.4 Scotland 6 Operations 7 Gradual decline 7.1 Railway competition 7.2 Limited modernisation to broad canals 7.3 20th century nationalisation 7.4 Transport Act 1968 8 Restoration 9 See also 10 References 10.1 Notes 10.2 Sources

[edit] Overview

The canal system grew rapidly at first, and became an almost completely-connected network covering the South, Midlands, and parts of the North of England and Wales. There were canals in Scotland, but they were not connected to the English canals or, generally (the main exception being the Monkland Canal, the Union Canal and the Forth and Clyde Canal which connected the River Clyde and Glasgow to the River Forth and Edinburgh) to each other. As building techniques improved, older canals were improved by straightenings, embankments, cuttings, tunnels, aqueducts, inclined planes, and boat lifts, which together snipped many miles and locks, and therefore, hours and cost, from journeys.

[edit] 19th century

The 19th century saw some major new canals such as the Caledonian Canal and the Manchester Ship Canal. By the second half of the 19th century, many canals were increasingly becoming owned by railway companies or competing with them, and many were in decline, with decreases in mile-ton charges in order to try and remain competitive. After this the less successful canals (particularly narrow-locked canals, whose boats could only carry about 30 tons) failed quickly.^[2]

[edit] 20th century

The 20th century brought competition from road-haulage, and only the strongest canals survived until the Second World War. After the war decline of trade on all remaining canals was rapid, and by the mid 1960s only a token traffic was left, even on the widest and most industrial waterways.

In the 1960s the infant canal leisure industry was only just sufficient to prevent the closure of the still-open canals, but then the pressure to maintain canals for leisure purposes increased. From the 1970's onwards, increasing numbers of closed canals were restored by enthusiast volunteers, and this continues today. The success of these projects has led to the funding and use of contractors to complete large restoration projects and complex civil engineering projects such as the restoration of the Victorian Anderton Boat Lift and the new Falkirk Wheel rotating lift. There are even plans to create new canals. It is said that^{[weasel words]} there are more boats on the canals today than at the height of the use of canals for commercial purposes.

[edit] Early history

The first British canals were built in Roman times as irrigation canals or short connecting spurs between navigable rivers, such as the Foss Dyke in Lincolnshire. See Roman Britain.

[edit] Middle Ages

A spate of building projects, such as castles, monasteries and churches, led to the improvement of rivers for the transportation of building materials.^[3] Various Acts of Parliament were passed regulating transportation of goods, tolls and horse towpaths for various rivers.^[3][4] These included the rivers Severn, Witham, Trent and Yorkshire Ouse.^[3]

[edit] Post-medieval transport systems

In the post-medieval period some natural waterways were 'canalised' or improved for boat traffic, in the 16th century. The first Act of Parliament was obtained by the City of Canterbury, in 1515, to extend navigation on the River Great Stour, followed by the River Exe in 1539, which led to the construction in 1566 of a new channel, the Exeter Canal.^[4] Simple flash locks were provided to regulate the flow of water and allow loaded boats to pass through shallow waters by admitting a rush of water, but these were not purpose-built canals as we understand them today.

The transport system that existed before the canals were built consisted of either coastal shipping or horses and carts struggling along mostly un-surfaced mud roads (although there were some surfaced Turnpike roads). There was also a small amount of traffic carried along navigable rivers. In the 17th century, as early industry started to expand, this transport situation was highly unsatisfactory. The restrictions of coastal shipping and river transport were obvious and horses and carts could only carry one or two tons of cargo at a time. The poor state of most of the roads meant that they could often become unusable after heavy rain. Because of the small loads that could be carried, supply of essential commodities such as coal, and iron ore were limited, and this kept prices high and restricted economic growth. One horse-drawn canal barge could carry about 30 tonnes at a time, faster than road transport and at half the cost.^[1]

Some 29 river navigation improvements took place in the 16th and 17th centuries.^[5]

[edit] The Industrial Revolution

The modern canal system was mainly a product of the 18th century and early 19th century. It came into being because the Industrial Revolution (which began in Britain during the mid-18th century) demanded an economic and reliable way to transport goods and commodities in large quantities.

By the early 18th century, river navigations such as the Aire and Calder Navigation were becoming quite sophisticated, with pound locks and longer and longer "cuts" (some with intermediate locks) to avoid circuitous or difficult stretches of river. Eventually, the experience of building long multi-level cuts with their own locks gave rise to the idea of building a "pure" canal, a waterway designed on the basis of where goods needed to go, not where a river happened to be.

The claim for the first pure canal in Britain is debated between "Sankey" and "Bridgewater" supporters.^[6] Others say that neither of these deserve the title, and that some (unspecified) true canals were constructed before the Industrial Revolution's 'canal mania'.

[edit] The Sankey Brook Navigation

The Sankey Brook Navigation, which connected St Helens with the River Mersey, is often claimed as the first modern "purely artificial" canal because although originally a scheme to make the Sankey Brook navigable, it included an entirely new artificial channel that was effectively a canal along the Sankey Brook valley.^[3][6] However, "Bridgewater" supporters point out that the last quarter-mile of the navigation is indeed a canalised stretch of the Brook, and that it was the Bridgewater Canal (less obviously associated with an existing river) that captured the popular imagination and inspired further canals.^[3][6]

[edit] The Bridgewater Canal

In the 1760s the 3rd Duke of Bridgewater, who owned a number of coal mines in northern England, wanted a reliable way to transport his coal to the rapidly industrialising city of Manchester. He commissioned the engineer James Brindley to build a canal to do just that. Brindley's design included an aqueduct carrying the canal over the River Irwell. This was an engineering wonder which immediately attracted tourists.^[3][6] The construction of this canal was funded entirely by the Duke and was called the Bridgewater Canal. It opened in 1761, and was the first major British canal.^[1]

[edit] Horse drawn canal transport

The new canals proved highly successful. The boats on the canal were horse-drawn with a towpath alongside the canal for the horse to walk along. This horse-drawn system proved to be highly economical and became standard across the British canal network. Commercial horse-drawn canal boats could be seen on Britain's canals until as late as the 1950s, although by then diesel powered boats, often towing a second unpowered boat, had become standard.

The canal boats could carry 30 tons at a time with only one horse pulling^[1] - more than ten times the amount of cargo per horse that was possible with a cart. Because of this huge increase in supply, the Bridgewater canal reduced the price of coal in Manchester by nearly two-thirds within just a year of its opening. The Bridgewater was also a huge financial success, with it earning what had been spent on its construction within just a few years.

[edit] The Golden Age

This success proved the viability of canal transport, and soon industrialists in many other parts of the country wanted canals. After the Bridgewater canal, the early canals were built by an amalgamation of private individuals with an interest in improving communications. In Staffordshire the famous potter Josiah Wedgwood saw an opportunity to bring bulky cargoes of clay to his factory doors, and to transport his fragile finished goods to market in Manchester, Birmingham or further afield by water, minimising breakages. Within just a few years of the Bridgewater's opening, an embryonic national canal network came into being, with the construction of canals such as the Oxford Canal and the Trent & Mersey Canal.^[2]

The new canal system was both cause and effect of the rapid industrialisation of the British Midlands and north. The period between the 1770s and the 1830s is often referred to as the "Golden Age" of British canals.

For each canal, an Act of Parliament was necessary to authorise construction, and as people saw the high incomes achieved from canal tolls, canal proposals came to be put forward by investors interested in profiting from dividends, at least as much as by people whose businesses would profit from cheaper transport of raw materials and finished goods.

In a further development, there was often out and out speculation, where people would try to buy shares in a newly-floated company simply to sell them on for an immediate profit, regardless of whether the canal was ever profitable, or even built. During this period of "canal mania", huge sums were invested in canal building, and although many schemes came to nothing, the canal system rapidly expanded to nearly 4000 miles (over 6400 kilometres) in length,^[1] with essentially no external competition.

Many rival canal companies were formed, often competing bitterly. Perhaps the best example of the inefficiencies caused by these rivalries is Worcester Bar in Birmingham, a point where the Worcester and Birmingham Canal and the Birmingham Canal Navigations Main Line were only seven feet apart, with no technical reasons why the canals could not be connected. For many years, a dispute about tolls meant that goods travelling through Birmingham had to be transhipped from boats in one canal to boats in the other.^[7]

[edit] Standard locks

For reasons of economy and the constraints of 18th century engineering technology, the early canals were built to a narrow width. The standard for the dimensions of narrow canal locks was set by Brindley with his first canal locks, those on the Trent and Mersey Canal in 1776. These locks were 72 feet 7 inches (22.1 metres) long by 7 feet 6 inches (2.3 metres) wide.^[6]. The narrow width was perhaps set by the fact that he was only able to build Harecastle Tunnel to accommodate 7 feet (2.1 metre) wide boats.^[6].

His next locks were wider. He built locks 72 feet 7 inches (22.1 metres) long by 15 feet (4.6 metres) wide when he extended the Bridgewater canal to Runcorn, where the canal's only locks lowered boats to the River Mersey.

The narrow locks on the T&M limited the size of the boats (which came to be called narrowboats), and thus limited the quantity of the cargo they could carry to around 30 tonnes. This decision would in later years make the canal network economically uncompetitive for freight transport, and by the mid 20th century it was no longer possible to work a 30 tonne load economically.

[edit] Geography

Brindley believed it would be possible to use canals to link the four great rivers of England: the Mersey, Trent, Severn and Thames. The Trent and Mersey Canal was the first part of this ambitious network, but although he and his assistants surveyed the whole potential system, he did not live to see it completed - coal was finally transported from the Midlands to the Thames at Oxford in January 1790, 18 years after his death. Development of the network was left to other engineers, such as Thomas Telford, whose Ellesmere Canal helped link the Severn and the Mersey.^[2]

[edit] The Midlands and the North of England

The bulk of the canal system was built in the industrial Midlands and the north of England, where navigable rivers most needed extending and connecting, and heavy cargoes of manufactured goods, raw materials or coal most needed carrying. Relatively few canals were built in southern England or London, (the Grand Junction Canal being an exception). The great manufacturing cities of Manchester and Birmingham were major economic drivers for the 'canal mania' which reached its peak in 1793, and both benefited from a network of canals, most of which survive. Birmingham, for example, has a greater length of canals than Venice (though in a larger area). Manchester's merchants, dissatisfied with the service from the port of Liverpool, bypassed the Liverpool monopoly on coastal trade by converting a section of the Irwell into the ship canal, opened in 1894.

[edit] London

By contrast, London was a port, served by already-navigable rivers like the Thames and the River Lee, although the Lee was canalised. It needed canals only to take goods in and out from sea-going ships, where such rivers were unavailable.

[edit] Wales and South West England

The south west had two cross-country canals, the Thames and Severn Canal and the Kennet and Avon canal, which linked to these four rivers; and were both linked into the national canal system via the Oxford Canal.

A few self-contained canals, not connected to the national system, were built in the South West of England, such as the Bude Canal and the St. Columb Canal. The same was true for south Wales. Some of these canals were short cuts: they allowed boats to move between the west and the south (and south to west) by a shorter route than following the coast.

[edit] Scotland

Within Scotland, the Forth and Clyde Canal and the Union Canal connected the major cities in the industrial central belt; they also provide a short cut for boats to cross between the west and the east without a sea voyage. The Caledonian Canal provided a similar function in the Highlands of Scotland. The Crinan Canal avoided the need for a long diversion around the Kintyre peninsula, and the Glasgow, Paisley and Johnstone Canal was intended to link these three places directly to the west coast of Scotland, but never reached beyond Johnstone.

[edit] Operations

On the majority of British canals the canal-owning companies did not own or run a fleet of boats, since this was usually prohibited by the Acts of Parliament setting them up to prevent monopolies developing. Instead they charged private operators tolls to use the canal. These tolls were also usually regulated by the Acts. From these tolls they would try, with varying degrees of success, to maintain the canal, pay back initial loans and pay dividends to their shareholders. In winter special icebreaker boats with reinforced hulls would be used to break the ice.

The boats used on canals were a mixed bunch, but on the narrow canals the 7 foot wide narrowboat was the standard. On the broad canals they were joined by wider boats which often derived from the type used on connecting rivers. All boats on the canals were horsedrawn and either worked "fly" or "standard". Flyboats carried cargo and sometimes passengers at relatively high speed day and night. These boats were crewed by four men, who operated a watch system whereby two men worked while the other two slept. Horses were changed regularly. Standard working involved travelling largely in daylight hours, with crews swapping boats so as to sleep at home most nights. The boats were owned and operated by individual carriers, or by carrying companies who would pay the helmsman a wage depending on the distance travelled, and the amount of cargo.

[edit] Gradual decline

[edit] Railway competition

From about 1840 railways began to present a threat to canals, as they could not only carry more than the canals but could transport people and goods far more quickly than the walking pace of the canal boats. Most of the investment that had previously gone into canal building was diverted into railway building.

Canal companies were unable to compete against the speed of the new railways, and in order to survive they had to slash their prices. This put an end to the huge profits that canal companies had enjoyed before the coming of the railways, and also had an effect on the boatmen who faced a big drop in wages. Flyboat working virtually ceased, as it could not compete with the railways on speed and the boatmen found they could only afford to keep their families by taking them with them on the boats. This became standard practice across the canal system, with in many cases families with several children living in tiny boat cabins, creating a considerable community of boat people. Though this community ostensibly had much in common with Gypsies both communities strongly resisted any such comparison, and surviving boat people feel deeply insulted if described as 'water gypsies'.

By the 1850s the railway system had become well established and the amount of cargo carried on the canals had fallen by nearly two-thirds, lost mostly to railway competition. In many cases struggling canal companies were bought out by railway companies. Sometimes this was a tactical move by railway companies to gain ground in their competitors' territory, but sometimes canal companies were bought out, either to close them down and remove competition or to build a railway on the line of the canal. A notable example of this is the Ashby-de-la-Zouch Canal in Leicestershire, which had its northern end closed down after being bought by a local railway company. Larger canal companies survived independently and were able to continue to make profits. The canals survived through the 19th century largely by occupying the niches in the transport market that the railways had missed, or by supplying local markets such as the coal-hungry factories and mills of the big cities.

Overall, the canals adapted to the appearance of railways and in 1900 the canal network differed little from its extent in 1830.

[edit] Limited modernisation to broad canals

During the 19th century in much of continental Europe the canal systems of many countries such as France, Germany and the Netherlands were drastically modernised and widened to take much larger boats, often able to transport up to 2000 tonnes, compared to the 30 to 100 tonnes that was possible on the much narrower British canals. As it is only economic to transport freight by canal if this is done in bulk, the widening ensured that in many of these countries, canal freight transport is still economically viable.

This canal modernisation never occurred on a large scale in Britain, partly because of the power of the railway companies who feared competition, and successfully blocked any attempt to modernise the canals. Thus almost uniquely in Europe, many of Britain's canals remain as they have been since the 18th and 19th century: mostly operated with narrowboats less than 7 feet (2.3 m) wide and 70 feet (23 m) long (although in parts of the country slightly larger canals were constructed, called 'broad' or 'wide' canals, which could take boats that were 14 feet wide and 70 feet long). A major exception to this stagnation was the Manchester Ship Canal, built in the 1890s using the existing River Irwell and River Mersey, to take ocean-going ships into the centre of Manchester via its neighbour Salford.^[2]

[edit] 20th century nationalisation

The canal network gradually declined. During the early 20th century, especially in the 1920s and 1930s, many canals, mostly in rural areas, were abandoned due to falling traffic, caused mainly by competition from road transport. However the main network saw brief surges in use during the First and Second World Wars and still carried a substantial amount of freight until the early 1950s. The final blow was delivered by technological change. Most of the canal system and inland waterways were nationalised in 1948, along with the railways, under the British Transport Commission, whose subsidiary Docks and Inland Waterways Executive managed them into the 1950s. During the 1950s and 1960s freight transport on the canals declined rapidly in the face of mass road transport, and several more canals were abandoned during this period. Most of the traffic on the canals by this time was in coal delivered to waterside factories which had no other convenient access. In the 1950s and 60s these factories either switched to using other fuels, often because of the Clean Air Act of 1956, or closed completely. The last carrying contract, to a jam factory near London, ended in 1971.

Under the Transport Act of 1962, the canals were transferred in 1963 to the British Waterways Board (BWB), now British Waterways, and the railways to the British Railways Board (BRB). In the same year a remarkably harsh winter saw many boats frozen into their moorings, and unable to move for weeks at a time. This was one of the reasons given for the decision by BWB to formally cease their commercial carrying on the canals. By this time the canal network had shrunk to just 2000 miles (3000 kilometres), half the size it was at its peak in the early 19th century. However, the basic network was still intact; many of the closures were of duplicate routes or branches.

[edit] Transport Act 1968

The Transport Act 1968 classified the nationalised waterways as:

• Commercial - Waterways that could still support commercial traffic;
• Cruising - Waterways that had a potential for leisure use, such as cruising, fishing and recreational use;
• Remainder - Waterways that no potential commercial or leisure use could be seen for.

British Waterways Board was required, under the Act, to keep Commercial Waterways, mainly in the north-east, fit for commercial use; and Cruising Waterways fit for cruising. However, these obligations were subject to the caveat of being by the most economical means. There was no requirement to maintain Remainder waterways or keep them in a navigable condition; they were to be treated in the most economic way possible, which could mean abandonment. British Waterways could also change the classification of an existing waterway. Parts, or all, of a Remainder Waterway canal could also be transferred to local authorities, etc; and this transfer could, as happened, allow roads and motorways to be built over them, mitigating the need to provide (expensive) accommodation bridges or aqueducts. The act also allowed local authorities to contribute to the upkeep of Remainder Waterways.^[8]

[edit] Restoration

Though commercial use of Britain's canals declined after World War II, recreational use gradually increased as people had more leisure time and disposable income. The establishment in 1946 of a group called the Inland Waterways Association by L. T. C. Rolt and Robert Aickman has helped revive interest in Britain's canals to the point where they are a major leisure destination.

In the past few decades, waterway restoration organisations have returned many hundreds of miles of abandoned and remaindered canals to use, and work is still ongoing to save many more. Many restoration projects have been led by local canal societies or trusts, who were initially formed to fight the closure of a remainder waterway or to save an abandoned canal from further decay. They now work with local authorities and landowners to develop restoration plans and secure funding. The physical work is sometimes done by contractors, sometimes by volunteers. In 1970 the Waterway Recovery Group was formed to co-ordinate volunteer efforts on canals and river navigations throughout Britain.

British Waterways has come to see the economic and social potential of canalside development, and moved from hostility towards restoration, through neutrality, towards a supportive stance. Whilst British Waterways is now broadly supportive of restoration, its official policy is that it will not take on support of newly restored navigations unless they come with a sufficient dowry to pay for their ongoing upkeep. In effect, this means either reclassifying the Remainder Waterway as a Cruising Waterway or entering into an agreement for another body to maintain the waterway.^[8]

There has also been a movement to redevelop canals in inner city areas, such as Birmingham, Manchester, Salford and Sheffield, which have both numerous waterways and urban blight. In these cities, waterways redevelopment provides a focus for successful commercial/residential developments such as Gas Street Basin in Birmingham, Castlefield Basin in Manchester, Salford Quays and Victoria Quays in Sheffield. However, these developments are sometimes controversial. In 2005 environmentalists complained that housing developments on London's waterways threatened the vitality of the canal system. ^[9]

[edit] See also

• Canals of Great Britain for a list of Britain's canals

[edit] References

[edit] Notes

[edit] Sources

• Blair, John (Edr.) (2007). Waterways and Canal-building in Medieval England. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 987-0-19-921715-1.
• Broadbridge, S.R., (1974). The Birmingham Canal Navigations. Volume 1: 1768-1846. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-6381-6.
  • Volume 2 was never published.
• Burton, Anthony, (1995). The Great Days of the Canals. London: Tiger Books International. ISBN 1-85501-695-8.
• Burton, Anthony, (1983). The Waterways of Britain: A Guide to the Canals and Rivers of England, Scotland and Wales. London: Willow Books, William Collins and Sons & Co Ltd. ISBN 0-00-218047-2.
• Hadfield, Charles, (1966). The Canals of the West Midlands. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-4660-1.
• Hadfield, Charles (1981). The Canal Age, Second, David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-8079-6. 
• Lindsay, Jean, (1968). The Canals of Scotland. Newton Abbot: David & Charles. ISBN 0-7153-4240-1.
• Paget-Tomlinson, E, (2006) The Ilustrated History of Canal & River Navigations: Landmark Publishing Ltd ISBN 1843062070
• Rolt, L.T.C., (1944). Narrow Boat. London: Eyre Methuen. ISBN 0-413-22000-1.
• Rolt, L.T.C., (1950). The Inland waterways of England. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. ISBN 0-04-386003-6.