High-occupancy vehicle lane
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article or section has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.
|
In transportation engineering and transportation planning, a high-occupancy vehicle lane (or HOV lane) is a lane reserved for vehicles with a driver and one or more passengers. These lanes are also known as carpool lanes, commuter lanes, diamond lanes, express lanes, and transit lanes.
Contents |
[edit] Qualified vehicles
Qualification for HOV status varies by locality, and may require more than two people. When an automobile is used as an HOV, the group of people using it is often called a carpool, though the term HOV includes buses and vans. However, bus lanes may not necessarily be intended for use by carpools. An HOV or carpool may be allowed to travel on special road lanes, usually denoted with a diamond marking in the United States and Canada, on which single occupant vehicles and trucks are prohibited, called restricted lanes, carpool lanes or diamond lanes. In some cases, single occupant vehicles are allowed provided that they are hybrid vehicles or use native fuels. U.S. federal law states that HOV lanes "must allow motorcycles and bicycles to use the HOV facility, unless either or both create a safety hazard."[1] In Canada, no such exemptions exist. In some areas, such as Southern California, Hartford, Connecticut, Seattle Area, Boston Area and the Greater Toronto Area, the HOV lanes are full-time, while in others, such as the San Francisco Bay Area, Phoenix, Long Island, and Northern New Jersey, they are usable by other vehicles outside of peak hours. Honolulu uses a "zipper" barrier to create an additional HOV lane on the westbound side of Interstate H-1 during peak hours.
In some regions, buses are allowed to travel on the road shoulder when traffic becomes heavy, but it is often still illegal for cars (even HOVs) to take the shoulder to get around traffic jams. Highway 403 in Mississauga, Ontario (Near Toronto, ON) and Highway 404 in York Region and Toronto, Ontario, Canada for instance had their shoulders widened in 2003 and 2004 respectively, so they serve a dual purpose as bus lanes and accident lanes. Although full HOV lanes are available for carpooling traffic, buses still continue to use shoulders along the 403. In Columbus, Ohio, shoulders on I-70 are HOV lanes reserved for buses at all times.
In emergency situations, an HOV "cordon" is sometimes placed prohibiting all vehicles from crossing the cordon during specified times. The cordon is enforced through the use of police checkpoints. For example, Midtown and Lower Manhattan were placed under cordons during the morning peak hours in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks and during the 2005 New York City transit strike.
[edit] Theory and practice
The relative rarity of high-occupancy vehicles compared to single occupancy vehicles—estimated at 7% of the traffic—in the United States and Canada makes HOV lanes work for the drivers who can use them. When it is uncongested, an HOV lane can move at full speed even when parallel (non-HOV) lanes suffer delays from queueing at bottlenecks. In theory, an HOV lane moves more people per lane at a higher speed while moving fewer vehicles.
In practice for some communities, including Atlanta, Houston, Los Angeles, Washington, D.C., and Seattle, HOV lanes regularly carry more people than adjacent regular lanes of travel, as reported by the Transportation Research Board HOV Committee.
Various organizations and services make it easier for commuters to utilize HOV lanes. Regional and corporate sponsored vanpools, carpools, and rideshare communities give commuters a way to increase occupancy. For locales where such services are lacking, online rideshare communities can serve a similar purpose.
[edit] Reversible lanes
Some cities that use separated HOV lanes make them reversible; i.e. usable only by inbound traffic during the morning rush and usable only by outbound traffic during the evening rush. This method met with criticism after an August 1995 incident in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in which a negligent highway employee failed to close the gate preventing access to the HOV lanes of Interstate 279. This led to a high-speed head-on collision that killed six people.[2]
Houston is a city which employs reversible HOV lanes.[3] Seattle uses reversible HOV lanes in sections of I-5 and I-90.[4] San Diego uses a reversible, separated 2-lane HOV route along an eight mile stretch of I-15 that travels south-bound in the morning and north-bound in the afternoon and evening. This route also doubles as a toll-road for single occupant vehicles using the CalTrans FasTrak system. The Vancouver area has a reversible lane on the Lions' Gate Bridge, on BC-7 at narrow high-traffic bridges, and on BC-99 at the George Massey Tunnel. Montreal employs reversible lanes on Park Avenue, and has reversible bus lanes on the Champlain Bridge.
[edit] Separate systems
Some HOV lanes are built on completely separate roadways from their corresponding general use lanes; some are constructed on parallel roads separated by a concrete barrier, while others are built on grade-separated (i.e. elevated or underground) roadways. One example is the Harbor Freeway in Los Angeles, California, where four HOV lanes travel on the upper deck of the freeway. This type of construction is said to maintain optimal efficiency by keeping general use traffic from merging back and forth into the HOV lanes, and by maximizing space on the main roadway for general use traffic.[citation needed] Additionally, major interchanges on such routes are often equipped with HOV-only ramps, which minimizes haphazard cross-freeway merging.
[edit] HOV-only highway
An extreme example is Interstate 66 in the Northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C. During rush hour, on a short segment of I-66 between the Capital Beltway and the Theodore Roosevelt Bridge, the entire roadway in the direction of rush-hour traffic (eastbound in the morning, westbound in the evening) is reserved for HOV.[5]
[edit] Criticism and legality
Some say that at the critical point when heavy traffic is about to become a traffic jam, the loss of the HOV lane from general use actually precipitates the traffic jam, making it a hollow victory. They also question how much ride-sharing they actually encourage, advantaging those who would be sharing a vehicle anyway. HOV lanes added to existing highways also tend to create more congestion at exits and interchanges where no HOV-only exits have been provided; the central position of the HOV lanes rule that vehicles must transition across all lanes of traffic in a short distance to exit. Some transportation departments, including Caltrans, have started building special direct ramps so HOV lane users can change freeways or directly enter and exit the HOV lane without having to merge across all lanes, but these ramps and flyovers are built at great expense.
Some also point out that the traffic speed differential between HOV and general purpose lanes creates a potentially dangerous situation if the HOV lanes are not separated by a barrier. (A Texas Transportation Institute study found that HOV lanes lacking barrier separations caused a 50% increase in injury crashes.[6])
Critics cite recent unpublished research of San Francisco-area HOV lanes that found the HOV system increased congestion, delays, and pollution while not increasing carpooling.
The National Motorists Association in the U.S. opposes HOV lanes[7] on the grounds that motorists are entitled to full use of highway systems paid for by their taxes.
In the Netherlands, the first HOV lane in Europe was opened on the Rijksweg 1 on 27 October 1993. On the first day, a former Minister of Transport and Water Management drove on the lane alone in his car in order to draw forth a test case. The judge ruled that Dutch traffic law didn't know the concept of a "carpool" and that the principle of equality was violated. A few years later the lane was opened to all traffic.
[edit] Possible future directions
A number of cities are considering converting under-utilized HOV lanes to high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. This would permit single-occupant vehicles to buy the right to use the HOV lanes for a toll, but total flow would be regulated (the price would be varied) to ensure total speeds on the HOV lane do not drop noticeably.
[edit] User phenomena
One symptom of HOV lanes that challenges the contention that HOV lanes are not effective has been the slugging phenomenon of the Washington, D.C. metro area. Slugging is the term used to describe a unique form of commuting where drivers go to pre-arranged "slug lines" and pick up commuters who need a ride. The driver shouts out his destination, and people in the line going to that destination enter the car in a first come first served basis. There is very specific etiquette to the system to ensure a fair, consistent, and agreeable commute for all. Slugging benefits drivers by enabling them to use the HOV lane, benefits "sluggers" by getting them rides, and benefits the community by decreasing the number of cars on the road. It however also carries most of the risks and problems of hitchhiking.[8]
In San Francisco and surrounding communities, designated casual carpool sites allow drivers to pick up passengers to the same destination.
When HOV lanes were first introduced in California in the 1970s, some drivers placed an inflatable person in the passenger seat in an attempt to fool regulators. This was soon outlawed, but the practice persists. In the UK in 2005, a camera that was claimed to distinguish mannequins or dolls from humans was being tested on the Forth Road Bridge in an effort to thwart cheaters.[9]
[edit] Free market rideshare
|
|
This article or section is written like an advertisement. Please help rewrite this article from a neutral point of view. Mark blatant advertising which would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic for speedy deletion, using {{db-spam}}. (May 2008) |
 |
This article or section may be slanted towards recent events. Please try to keep recent events in historical perspective. (January 2008) |
 |
Although very new, free market rideshare services are beginning to pop up. Services such as RideshareX and Ridester.com are a two examples of a new way of approaching carpooling. In the past, the biggest problem for carpoolers was for the driver to get reimbursed for providing the ride. The carpool members felt that just being there to qualify for the lane was enough of a reimbursement. Consequently, some drivers have been looking for a better way to collect. Services such as the two mentioned above (RideshareX and Ridester) have tools for the driver to post a ride and recover the cost of reimbursement for the travel. The prospective passengers can search the database and find the best fit for their travel and budget. There are also agreements between the driver and passenger so that disputes can be settled without going to court.
[edit] See also
- Bus lane
- Bus rapid transit
- High-occupancy toll (HOT)
- Local-express lanes, another form of lane separation for congestion mitigation
- Public transit
- Toll road
- Transit lanes, the Australian equivalent to high-occupancy vehicle lanes.
- Transportation Demand Management
[edit] References
- ^ Fact Sheets on Highway Provisions. Retrieved on 2008-04-13.
- ^ New HOV gates start Monday on Parkway North
- ^ QuickRide::The HOV System
- ^ Puget Sound Freeway and HOV Performance Statistics
- ^ High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Systems
- ^ http://tti.tamu.edu/product/product_details.asp?book_id=25946
- ^ HOV Lanes - Tolls/Congestion Fees - National Motorists Association
- ^ Morning Slug Lines in Northern Virginia and Washington DC
- ^ Cyclops cam can distinguish between humans and blow-up dolls - Engadget
