Hart-Fuller debate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Hart-Fuller debate is an exchange between Lon Fuller and H.L.A. Hart published in the Harvard Law Review in 1958 on morality and law, which demonstrated the divide between the positivist and natural law philosophy. Hart took the positivist view in arguing that morality and law were separate while Fuller argued for morality as the source of law's binding power.
[edit] Reference
- H. L. A. Hart, "Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals", 71 Harv. L. Rev. 593 (1958)
- Lon L. Fuller, "Positivism and Fidelity to Law - A Reply to Professor Hart", 71 Harv. L. Rev. 630 (1958).
[edit] External links
- Jan Komárek: Ještě ke konferenci k padesátinám debaty mezi HLA Hartem a Lonem Fullerem (Czech)
 |
This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
